IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sigtran] Query regarding capacity of sigtran link

"Abhishek Bhatt" <abhishek.bhatt@telesys.com> Mon, 08 August 2016 13:01 UTC

Return-Path: <abhishek.bhatt@telesys.com>
X-Original-To: sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ABA812B00C for <sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 06:01:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kLVeyFIc6XJW for <sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 06:01:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp72.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (smtp72.iad3a.emailsrvr.com [173.203.187.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D20A812B00B for <sigtran@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 06:01:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp18.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp18.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 62CE1A0351; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 09:01:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from app23.wa-webapps.iad3a (relay-webapps.rsapps.net [172.27.255.140]) by smtp18.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 5803AA0304; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 09:01:24 -0400 (EDT)
X-Sender-Id: abhishek.bhatt@telesys.com
Received: from app23.wa-webapps.iad3a (relay-webapps.rsapps.net [172.27.255.140]) by 0.0.0.0:25 (trex/5.7.1); Mon, 08 Aug 2016 09:01:24 -0400
Received: from telesys.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by app23.wa-webapps.iad3a (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B266C1A9D; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 09:01:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by apps.rackspace.com (Authenticated sender: abhishek.bhatt@telesys.com, from: abhishek.bhatt@telesys.com) with HTTP; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 18:31:24 +0530 (IST)
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 18:31:24 +0530
From: Abhishek Bhatt <abhishek.bhatt@telesys.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_20160808183124000000_64752"
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Type: html
In-Reply-To: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D5F50C32C@AcuExch.aculab.com>
References: <PS1PR04MB172269BA2582F52F16885623DE0E0@PS1PR04MB1722.apcprd04.prod.outlook.c om> <1470651763.92914545@webmail.telesys.com> <20160808122239.GA2432@openss7.com> <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D5F50C32C@AcuExch.aculab.com>
X-Auth-ID: abhishek.bhatt@telesys.com
Message-ID: <1470661284.30557827@webmail.telesys.com>
X-Mailer: webmail/12.5.2-RC
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sigtran/3bRnQPfGEdcnpoiZgqZgxhpoon8>
Cc: "sigtran@ietf.org" <sigtran@ietf.org>, "'bidulock@openss7.com'" <bidulock@openss7.com>
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Query regarding capacity of sigtran link
X-BeenThere: sigtran@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Signaling Transport <sigtran.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sigtran>, <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sigtran/>
List-Post: <mailto:sigtran@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran>, <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 13:01:29 -0000

Thanks for your updates
 
-----Original Message-----
From: "David Laight" <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 6:25pm
To: "'bidulock@openss7.com'" <bidulock@openss7.com>, "sigtran@ietf.org" <sigtran@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Query regarding capacity of sigtran link



From: Brian F. G. Bidulock
> Sent: 08 August 2016 13:23
> Abhishek,
> 
> Abhishek Bhatt wrote: (Mon, 08 Aug 2016 15:52:43)
> >
> > Can you please let me know about the maximum capacity (max traffic) of
> > single sigtran associations (link) for both M3UA link and M2PA link.
> 
> Depends largely on how much network you have between the two points.

And how fast the systems are, and how 'slick' the application and the rest
of the protocol stack is.

The attainable throughput could quite easily be dominated by the application.

 David

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
Sigtran@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email