Re: [Sigtran] Is there any performance impact, if we tune kernel SCTP (/proc/sys/net/sctp/sack_timeout) parameter??
Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> Tue, 04 February 2014 12:56 UTC
Return-Path: <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
X-Original-To: sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 3443A1A036D for <sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 4 Feb 2014 04:56:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.086
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-2.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hPC_-86g9m3A for
<sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 04:56:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-n.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de
[IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with
ESMTP id 0B0741A0383 for <sigtran@ietf.org>;
Tue, 4 Feb 2014 04:56:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.102] (p5481A288.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
[84.129.162.136]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by mail-n.franken.de
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C9291C0B4054; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 13:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <abcd1234abc123ab12a0000031211000020000005002@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 13:56:39 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <59EF6C85-4694-4BF1-936A-1F6BB4680046@lurchi.franken.de>
References: <abcd1234abc123ab12a0000031211000020000005002@gmail.com>
To: Norah Jones <nh.jones01@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: sigtran@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Is there any performance impact,
if we tune kernel SCTP (/proc/sys/net/sctp/sack_timeout) parameter??
X-BeenThere: sigtran@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Signaling Transport <sigtran.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sigtran>,
<mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sigtran/>
List-Post: <mailto:sigtran@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran>,
<mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 12:56:44 -0000
On Feb 4, 2014, at 8:09 AM, Norah Jones <nh.jones01@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Can we set the same to 0? If so, how?? You can use the SCTP_DELAYED_SACK socket option to set the SACK frequency to 1. See http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6458#section-8.1.19 Best regards Michael > > Thanks, > Norah Jones > > > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > Sigtran@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran >
- [Sigtran] Is there any performance impact, if we … Norah Jones
- Re: [Sigtran] Is there any performance impact, if… Michael Tuexen
- Re: [Sigtran] Is there any performance impact, if… Cauci Filippo