Re: [Sigtran] State-machines wrong in the RFC-3332 and RFC-4666 ??!!
Ajay Garg <ajaygargnsit@gmail.com> Thu, 13 March 2014 08:51 UTC
Return-Path: <ajaygargnsit@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 1628D1A0993 for <sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 13 Mar 2014 01:51:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.405
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-0.405 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6, PLING_QUERY=0.994,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tjHHU9c40hLA for
<sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 01:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x232.google.com (mail-pa0-x232.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id
8FF851A098C for <sigtran@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 01:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id kq14so806002pab.37 for
<sigtran@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 01:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type; bh=jfGV1lWFl6AUg4m3CL4WkrYzVF9Ulx+oORxAx1hH/gY=;
b=TCZ+9acasVP82HBTD8XBojCYXqoS4b8sgSc54ZVL8awHtGo88529KSwiIrbrbpDAZf
eTX7nfmY42a5augc6rNilVoCnlUiLbglzoyHy/wIS4AoXg0odtGwKRkebVsb0CPXtFe+
rSBWSEObQMTCsJPBrGOEpBUCw5ddH1apXJNnoNHpiEafKd1TtquFqAPVxtut8Xsiv6J8
NTsdh+E77z5hadAsVf2MUFVz7sUqifUAqegXONt8SuRh8ef86LSXvyD3QxJQFQlchblZ
XHnQsrbXvKyITzT77eoT8PPQGjXBMiO/n5/Q7Y6powlPb8fAEEstCW+tBXD4DhlpLy5u +r5A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.163.164 with SMTP id yj4mr723977pab.91.1394700655346;
Thu, 13 Mar 2014 01:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.92.9 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 01:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140313072404.GC15132@openss7.org>
References: <CAHP4M8W42_NTvwQJzGf5cM21-8jQu9dGmGzHXQ8zoeq380cLZA@mail.gmail.com>
<20140313070632.GA15132@openss7.org>
<CAHP4M8W7cFsATw5icyZO1f6qRc-FTu-b1=QooJu4Pqw6LBi5og@mail.gmail.com>
<20140313072404.GC15132@openss7.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 14:20:55 +0530
Message-ID: <CAHP4M8W6NzM2Mz0Ea+QUR90LuYZsRDi21Srm-hQeAd3kL8pVxQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ajay Garg <ajaygargnsit@gmail.com>
To: bidulock@openss7.org, sigtran@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b86ec5e2148e804f4790d3a
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sigtran/KGX9JIayC1RGtc0pA6qfFh1XpDA
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] State-machines wrong in the RFC-3332 and RFC-4666 ??!!
X-BeenThere: sigtran@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Signaling Transport <sigtran.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sigtran>,
<mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sigtran/>
List-Post: <mailto:sigtran@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran>,
<mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 08:51:04 -0000
Thanks Brian !! On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Brian F. G. Bidulock <bidulock@openss7.org > wrote: > Ajay, > > Please see comments below... > > Ajay Garg wrote: (Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:50:42) > > We are in the process of moving to the new release of the stack > > provided by our vendor (right now, the stack uses M3UA in accordance > > with RFC 3332). > > For purely academic purposes, I guess that here too "Notify > > (AS-ACTIVE)" would be sent to all the ASPs (as per your reply to my > > second query, and RFC-3332 also has the same "Notify Procedures")? > > RFC 3332 has the same statement in section 4.3.4.5. > > --brian > > -- > Brian F. G. Bidulock > bidulock@openss7.org > http://www.openss7.org/ > -- Regards, Ajay
- [Sigtran] State-machines wrong in the RFC-3332 an… Ajay Garg
- Re: [Sigtran] State-machines wrong in the RFC-333… Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Sigtran] State-machines wrong in the RFC-333… Ajay Garg
- Re: [Sigtran] State-machines wrong in the RFC-333… Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Sigtran] State-machines wrong in the RFC-333… Ajay Garg