Re: [Sigtran] Number of links towards a DPC (ITU)
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock@openss7.org> Mon, 17 June 2013 13:01 UTC
Return-Path: <bidulock@openss7.org>
X-Original-To: sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 3ECC921F9BA6 for <sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 17 Jun 2013 06:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lu3sl4Wb4aOw for
<sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 06:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gw.openss7.com (gw.openss7.com [142.59.210.7]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF0F21F9BAD for <sigtran@ietf.org>;
Mon, 17 Jun 2013 06:01:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net (ns5.evil.openss7.net
[192.168.9.5]) by gw.openss7.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP
id r5HD149h013520; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 07:01:04 -0600
Received: from wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id
r5HD14Tl020281; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 07:01:04 -0600
Received: (from brian@localhost) by wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net
(8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id r5HD12Be020280; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 07:01:02 -0600
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 07:01:02 -0600
From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock@openss7.org>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Message-ID: <20130617130102.GA20124@openss7.org>
Mail-Followup-To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
Arvind Kumar <arvindverma77@gmail.com>, sigtran@ietf.org
References: <CAE4qXDFfy+7BycUNrWNGm=Lo4U=WMZH9FDjw1kqWy71nKNbEhw@mail.gmail.com>
<20130614215503.GA966@openss7.org>
<AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6026B7291@saturn3.aculab.com>
<20130617101828.GA17340@openss7.org>
<AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6026B7292@saturn3.aculab.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6026B7292@saturn3.aculab.com>
Organization: http://www.openss7.org/
Dsn-Notification-To: <bidulock@openss7.org>
X-Spam-To: <blockme@openss7.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: Arvind Kumar <arvindverma77@gmail.com>, sigtran@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Number of links towards a DPC (ITU)
X-BeenThere: sigtran@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: bidulock@openss7.org
List-Id: Signaling Transport <sigtran.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sigtran>,
<mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sigtran>
List-Post: <mailto:sigtran@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran>,
<mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:01:31 -0000
David, David Laight wrote: (Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:52:03) > > >From deciding not to do it when fixing our mtp3 routing rules! > > Q.704 section 2.3 states that the routing is based on information > from the routing label - normally the sls and dpc. > With 2 linksets of 16 links the 'normal' link assignment could use > one bit of the sls to select between the linksets and the low bit > of the dpc and the other 3 bits of the sls to select one of the > 16 links in the linkset. > This would be perfectly valid. Routing not linkset selection. It is not valid because it does not lead to an even loadsharing over links. > > Q.705 A is only an example mesh network. > The appendix is describing the routing under fault conditions. > The network in the figure (using a fixed bit position for linkset selection) is the common practice for ITU. -- Brian F. G. Bidulock bidulock@openss7.org http://www.openss7.org/
- [Sigtran] Number of links towards a DPC (ITU) Arvind Kumar
- Re: [Sigtran] Number of links towards a DPC (ITU) David Laight
- Re: [Sigtran] Number of links towards a DPC (ITU) Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Sigtran] Number of links towards a DPC (ITU) David Laight
- Re: [Sigtran] Number of links towards a DPC (ITU) Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Sigtran] Number of links towards a DPC (ITU) David Laight
- Re: [Sigtran] Number of links towards a DPC (ITU) Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Sigtran] Number of links towards a DPC (ITU) Nemana, Satya
- Re: [Sigtran] Number of links towards a DPC (ITU) Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Sigtran] Number of links towards a DPC (ITU) David Laight
- Re: [Sigtran] Number of links towards a DPC (ITU) Nemana, Satya
- Re: [Sigtran] Number of links towards a DPC (ITU) David Laight