Re: [Sigtran] Optional RC configured on one side and not the other
Richard Knowles <richardk@adax.com> Tue, 19 November 2013 19:41 UTC
Return-Path: <richardk@adax.com>
X-Original-To: sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D46A1AE1C6 for <sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:41:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.425
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-2.425 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.525] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d3eQGrMQGHYz for
<sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:41:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.adax.com (mail1.adax.com [70.36.226.176]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA33B1AE1B9 for <sigtran@ietf.org>;
Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:41:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from adax (adax [12.0.0.88]) by mail1.adax.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id AE0D51E1267; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:41:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by adax (Postfix, from userid 187) id A0D318EE6E;
Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:41:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by adax (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 974848EE59; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:41:12 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:41:12 -0800 (PST)
From: Richard Knowles <richardk@adax.com>
X-X-Sender: richardk@adax.adax
To: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock@openss7.org>
In-Reply-To: <20131119074259.GA21962@openss7.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1311191136110.29945@adax.adax>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1311181020000.3090@adax.adax>
<20131119074259.GA21962@openss7.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: sigtran@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Optional RC configured on one side and not the other
X-BeenThere: sigtran@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Signaling Transport <sigtran.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sigtran>,
<mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sigtran/>
List-Post: <mailto:sigtran@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran>,
<mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 19:41:20 -0000
Thanks Brian, In IPSP DE mode which basically the same as ASP-SG it would seem you would have to allow this. The side not using RC would still have to send a NOTIFY with an RC when it received an ASPAC with an RC correct? Richard Knowles On Tue, 19 Nov 2013, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > Richard, > > Richard Knowles wrote: (Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:24:25) > > > > Assume you have the conditions (one AS, etc.) to allow RC to be > > optional, does the RFC permit one side (IPSP SE mode for example) to > > still send an RC and the other to not include an RC? I think the > > answer is yes, but I can't find an explicit reference permitting it. > > Nothing forbidding it either. Whether RC is included or not could > even vary on a message-by-message basis from either ASP. > > --brian > >
- [Sigtran] Optional RC configured on one side and … Richard Knowles
- Re: [Sigtran] Optional RC configured on one side … Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Sigtran] Optional RC configured on one side … Richard Knowles