IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Sigtran] Sigtran interworking issue between multivendor node

gitam changkakoti <gitam.changkakoti@live.in> Mon, 25 July 2016 09:44 UTC

Return-Path: <gitam.changkakoti@live.in>
X-Original-To: sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8612C12D74F for <sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 02:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tJ2khAQLCKpC for <sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 02:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from COL004-OMC2S3.hotmail.com (col004-omc2s3.hotmail.com [65.55.34.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8866812D74E for <sigtran@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 02:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from APC01-HK2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.55.34.71]) by COL004-OMC2S3.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Mon, 25 Jul 2016 02:44:52 -0700
Received: from HK2APC01FT047.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.248.59) by HK2APC01HT078.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.249.76) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.539.16; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 09:44:50 +0000
Received: from PS1PR0301MB2122.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.152.248.57) by HK2APC01FT047.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.249.86) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.549.5 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 09:44:50 +0000
Received: from PS1PR0301MB2122.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.167.51.24]) by PS1PR0301MB2122.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.167.51.24]) with mapi id 15.01.0544.019; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 09:44:48 +0000
From: gitam changkakoti <gitam.changkakoti@live.in>
To: "sigtran@ietf.org" <sigtran@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Sigtran interworking issue between multivendor node
Thread-Index: AQHR5lkuswNAJb2G+ke8mLGKVuGbsw==
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 09:44:48 +0000
Message-ID: <PS1PR0301MB212239D13AA549F53900907BED0D0@PS1PR0301MB2122.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=softfail (sender IP is 10.152.248.57) smtp.mailfrom=live.in; live.in; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;live.in; dmarc=none action=none header.from=live.in;
received-spf: SoftFail (protection.outlook.com: domain of transitioning live.in discourages use of 10.152.248.57 as permitted sender)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-tmn: [j9sAnnwgOONuzt1YT6YHv1xu7g2Gi5Y/]
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:10.152.248.57; IPV:NLI; CTRY:; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(98900003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:HK2APC01HT078; H:PS1PR0301MB2122.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en;
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; HK2APC01HT078; 6:vvtlRltNSdi2MySHLqzP4MyPW0wQVzQijJSinafP0K3lC2mBQ3v3rFTnGT0JNBZLfLYHyq6RQC+xZB1BjrNwlziJdp+5CPUtcHYQ+VWXlfm/aeYNtGUuJcnkeMKGQMRWn7gHbdggfWB4tRTZeQY/uttvOnh9ZBech4HqZzG6s3GHTLkUQ3+INm8FsMhFz92XN1ZcC1XgcsXZWD2k0neG9bKac9QX7sxrojNXzMNOA8nAup48kPSPnjKeghE+Zq73r5MajQ5i5ub/mRX4CwRofMX2vDo7lh/BJ7ZLPwbxqk/wxfr8vGiSbhLrswnpKXIP; 5:Cg4uR8LQQPV8kSAydbgkYYCz1UFMpAcPcfrlRWCsV6lmDyuAD+KsmsQ7ip1XQ7QqV1EaPEIHlg6XNROe9TGBjh7u5c2Gik0PG17oZJXSj7uNYDHDnWQx5PrIU/wyNQR5hQp86Ip9FL+NuEjv+3UhoQ==; 24:Si/E1+9xCCF9NuYcN5Q1tG+o9fgK/PkkCmk4zZkK5WvVsGV1pbZlZ/U27w4DUN3Mla5Q7jlIPuMEvu+j+4iv0rIdCP/yVYJLXnLNeAW5wyY=; 7:ZgdaHNAih4QKPlyYrjdQ5ijOxIJqvOCM5CAg0RVQKV61OYR2isT8wMmCGR9iZIeUp++M3xwOMsQmzxwn3AtZWOlhYm21GsWxJ5uoVp2hjpZ41wMTKbn0YOVvUZ/gQuGnzCgxCPhKHS7OczwjfZco/W4rOuo4c5N4PPwl5cnzrRM1DcYfPIorQuUlIi0a4nIR0XNxZGEhHY2utmpiby3CUW2JzpH8O4YAydG9S1RiWXl5xZ2EaJDlCsZlukR3DdrR
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: e36f7eb8-d449-44e3-a9a1-08d3b4705172
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(1601124038)(1601125047); SRVR:HK2APC01HT078;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(432015012)(82015046); SRVR:HK2APC01HT078; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:HK2APC01HT078;
x-forefront-prvs: 0014E2CF50
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <ECF3943DD3AC1648BBC2C0CFB20AC83F@sct-15-1-485-9-msonline-outlook-d5175.templateTenant>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 25 Jul 2016 09:44:48.2005 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HK2APC01HT078
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jul 2016 09:44:52.0897 (UTC) FILETIME=[3197E110:01D1E659]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sigtran/kke8kAz4zDpkKTocm-uJWpcC0ho>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 08:10:50 -0700
Subject: [Sigtran] Sigtran interworking issue between multivendor node
X-BeenThere: sigtran@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Signaling Transport <sigtran.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sigtran>, <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sigtran/>
List-Post: <mailto:sigtran@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran>, <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:09:58 -0000

Dear All,

Greetings .... This mail is intended to seek suggestion on Sigtran connectivity between multivendor node.

We are trying to connect open MGW to an AOIP BSC. Both belongs to different vendors. Fluctuation of M3Ua SUA observed at BSC end post   Connectivity. 

As per MGW vendor BSC is not supposed to send SUA management messages to MGW( DAUD) which is causing MGW to send DUNA to BSC inturn causing fluctuations @ BSc end for mgw cluster SPC.

Please be informed, there is no fluctuation @ association level. Kindly suggest and share the actual guidelines . What should happen as per Rfc.

Regards
Gitam
+919706818836



Sent from my iPhone

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email