Re: [Sigtran] Number of links towards a DPC (ITU)

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock@openss7.org> Mon, 17 June 2013 10:18 UTC

Return-Path: <bidulock@openss7.org>
X-Original-To: sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B99621F885A for <sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 03:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YjFyAL6Xkqtg for <sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 03:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gw.openss7.com (gw.openss7.com [142.59.210.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A534D21F9BBD for <sigtran@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 03:18:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net (ns5.evil.openss7.net [192.168.9.5]) by gw.openss7.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id r5HAISgH012824; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 04:18:29 -0600
Received: from wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id r5HAIS5h017813; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 04:18:28 -0600
Received: (from brian@localhost) by wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id r5HAIS5h017812; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 04:18:28 -0600
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 04:18:28 -0600
From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock@openss7.org>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Message-ID: <20130617101828.GA17340@openss7.org>
Mail-Followup-To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>, Arvind Kumar <arvindverma77@gmail.com>, sigtran@ietf.org
References: <CAE4qXDFfy+7BycUNrWNGm=Lo4U=WMZH9FDjw1kqWy71nKNbEhw@mail.gmail.com> <20130614215503.GA966@openss7.org> <AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6026B7291@saturn3.aculab.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6026B7291@saturn3.aculab.com>
Organization: http://www.openss7.org/
Dsn-Notification-To: <bidulock@openss7.org>
X-Spam-To: <blockme@openss7.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: Arvind Kumar <arvindverma77@gmail.com>, sigtran@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Number of links towards a DPC (ITU)
X-BeenThere: sigtran@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: bidulock@openss7.org
List-Id: Signaling Transport <sigtran.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sigtran>, <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sigtran>
List-Post: <mailto:sigtran@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran>, <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:18:56 -0000

David,

David Laight wrote:                         (Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:10:52)
> 
> In ITU each linkset can have 16 links.
> Brian is right in that MTP3 only has a 4 bit SLS value to select the
> destination link, so traffic to a specific destination will only use
> a maximum of 16 links even if there are routes by 2 adjacents and there
> are 16 links in the linkset to each.
> 
> If you have two linksets with 16 links each, the routing rules for
> different destinations could be arranged to use different links
> in order to utilise all 32 links.

I don't know where you got that idea.  See Figure A.3/Q.705.  Count the
number of links possible in a linkset (not a combined linkset).
8 links per A linkset, 4 links per B/D linkset.

> 
> ANSI only has 4 bits for the SLC (not 5), so a linkset is limited to 16 links.
> However the larger SLS value (8 bits, 5 in some earlier versions)
> means that MTP3 can loadshare between more links.
>

Pardon, SLC is 4 bits, but there are still 16 links per linkset,
32 links per combined linkset.

> 
> It also isn't quite right to say that one of the bits is used for
> linkset selection. If some of the links are down, the sls that
> would be assigned to the 'down' links are evenly spread across
> all of the working links, not just assigned to the working links
> in their original linkset (this might be a config option since
> the ANSI and ITU specs differ here.)

It is quite right to say that 1 bit is used for linkset selection,
as it says in 7.3/T1.111.5.

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
bidulock@openss7.org
http://www.openss7.org/