[Sigtran] Is there any performance impact, if we tune kernel SCTP (/proc/sys/net/sctp/sack_timeout) parameter??
Norah Jones <nh.jones01@gmail.com> Tue, 04 February 2014 07:09 UTC
Return-Path: <nh.jones01@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ECC71A0377 for <sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 3 Feb 2014 23:09:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.95
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.95 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8,
DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oc0c8Gy1R8UU for
<sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 23:09:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-x234.google.com (mail-pd0-x234.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id
7073A1A0371 for <sigtran@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 23:09:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f180.google.com with SMTP id x10so7865639pdj.39 for
<sigtran@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 23:09:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=date:to:from:reply-to:subject:message-id:mime-version
:content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
bh=nhRRBrwq9wWhWKbP5Ywqc7tXEIMV0hUABJ4m+cdm85w=;
b=HW7RiS3xOjT+z99EsaqdrIKMwi4fSJykThd47sLjNc26htMCXmmwU/NckVu+Lquuz0
gT6mwdL0R6/qjr0zbL3BSX17L0FrLoeco2k4kQ62eWHOYCFrHFtchM8UmD7JQ6X1WAXK
Nd2q2dTPgB5zkwSjfjRjL4C8+L6i64MKn72dZayHZXqEhY46TyWLrXUfIKwO8NQLe3Ce
iF3IPubozFu2lNWw8Ag/7+6my3Xh7vQ1YHiEF1ymQ7g7qKIQOkqKNtdir990bJu4ckZM
CvPcngX2+O33tMFPK5/9eqEZubnueR/ud6blTZdUCev5PkGynn4OwS/8r+QL26UucZ3W fAbw==
X-Received: by 10.66.51.137 with SMTP id k9mr42784263pao.11.1391497763294;
Mon, 03 Feb 2014 23:09:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from www.queryhome.com
(ec2-54-214-12-95.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com. [54.214.12.95]) by
mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ac5sm33617044pbc.37.2014.02.03.23.09.22 for
<sigtran@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Mon, 03 Feb 2014 23:09:22 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 07:09:21 +0000
To: sigtran@ietf.org
From: Norah Jones <nh.jones01@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <abcd1234abc123ab12a0000031211000020000005002@gmail.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: CatPHPMailer 5.1 (phpmailer.sourceforge.net)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Subject: [Sigtran] Is there any performance impact,
if we tune kernel SCTP (/proc/sys/net/sctp/sack_timeout) parameter??
X-BeenThere: sigtran@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Norah Jones <nh.jones01@gmail.com>
List-Id: Signaling Transport <sigtran.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sigtran>,
<mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sigtran/>
List-Post: <mailto:sigtran@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran>,
<mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 07:09:24 -0000
Hi, Can we set the same to 0? If so, how?? Thanks, Norah Jones
- [Sigtran] Is there any performance impact, if we … Norah Jones
- Re: [Sigtran] Is there any performance impact, if… Michael Tuexen
- Re: [Sigtran] Is there any performance impact, if… Cauci Filippo