IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Sigtran] State-machines wrong in the RFC-3332 and RFC-4666 ??!!

Ajay Garg <ajaygargnsit@gmail.com> Thu, 13 March 2014 06:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ajaygargnsit@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E8E1A08F9 for <sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 23:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.005
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.005 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PLING_QUERY=0.994, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YcBaRtp2x5WS for <sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 23:45:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x233.google.com (mail-pd0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DCD1A08E4 for <sigtran@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 23:45:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f179.google.com with SMTP id w10so653334pde.10 for <sigtran@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 23:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=A1j6lyHt5NdQ9loPyRmBTjU5ivIO0MfMkjXOryixYAk=; b=iG2SJiKn3hXls+atm+esz3t95fKwifCKkmLgh/ER1WBm4k93JkgBY6Yn78XYd5J24B racUUPtn0oMAh2n9slOSp0CPhDeBD4oFpaWVaDdqf1EXRXWvGl/qfnsRwIEOPEGO9RBe ee/pKQmzrdblUz28qX8Z5ki7VpigMr4bsqoQwE9zlw4mrqJ185EKgLUtAv1IOsJ1rw6b yj4pEfRqGYlG/G1RBUqxjqPw0hhVrfTbKAweb9HjrlgeXXJAzd7Ey6Rv7yRpBbzocOwv AoxQU4IyhZXopviYbjQdQMtXODKtIeUNjrJsacyeOyhtrtCO89VVF4oJvEFGQ9f51t7Z RnAw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.7.66 with SMTP id h2mr143603pba.91.1394693108160; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 23:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.92.9 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 23:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:15:08 +0530
Message-ID: <CAHP4M8W42_NTvwQJzGf5cM21-8jQu9dGmGzHXQ8zoeq380cLZA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ajay Garg <ajaygargnsit@gmail.com>
To: sigtran@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec52156a948606b04f4774bf0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sigtran/w3buQpdM8IqvAv89ZDyIiNsxv2A
Subject: [Sigtran] State-machines wrong in the RFC-3332 and RFC-4666 ??!!
X-BeenThere: sigtran@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Signaling Transport <sigtran.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sigtran>, <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sigtran/>
List-Post: <mailto:sigtran@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran>, <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 06:45:17 -0000

Hi all.

Sorry if I am acting stupid, but


1)
At https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3332.txt, in the section

                               5.1.4 Three ASPs in an Application Server
("n+k" sparing, loadsharing case)

should not "Notify (AS-ACTIVE)" be sent to ASP1 and ASP2 (as against ASP2
and ASP3 as per the diagram), since ASP1 and ASP2 are the ones that sent
the "ASP Act (Ldshr)" message (and are thus the "n" active ASPs)?



2)
At https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4666, in the section


<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4666#section-5.1.4>5.1.4 Three ASPs in an
Application Server ("n+k" sparing, loadsharing case)


why will "Notify (AS-ACTIVE)" be sent to ASP3 (since only ASP1 and ASP2
sent the "ASP Act. (Ldshr)" message, and are thus the "n" active ASPs)?





Again, sorry if I am missing something very fundamental.



Thanks and Regards,
Ajay

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email