Re: [Sigtran] Conceptual doubt between an ASP and SGP
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock@openss7.org> Thu, 13 March 2014 07:17 UTC
Return-Path: <bidulock@openss7.org>
X-Original-To: sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFE71A06AB for <sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:17:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fhrmmmKwzFxC for
<sigtran@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:17:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gw.openss7.com (gw.openss7.com [142.59.210.7]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECDAD1A001F for <sigtran@ietf.org>;
Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net (ns5.evil.openss7.net
[192.168.9.5]) by gw.openss7.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP
id s2D7HUOl020830; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 01:17:30 -0600
Received: from wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id
s2D7HTlZ015584; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 01:17:29 -0600
Received: (from brian@localhost) by wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net
(8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id s2D7HT3T015583; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 01:17:29 -0600
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 01:17:29 -0600
From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock@openss7.org>
To: Ajay Garg <ajaygargnsit@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20140313071729.GB15132@openss7.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Ajay Garg <ajaygargnsit@gmail.com>, sigtran@ietf.org
References: <CAHP4M8VFfMjLXGQ703yL+Ne7Dujf7GmxOjJY+Ndvzn9k5K553Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHP4M8VFfMjLXGQ703yL+Ne7Dujf7GmxOjJY+Ndvzn9k5K553Q@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: http://www.openss7.org/
Dsn-Notification-To: <bidulock@openss7.org>
X-Spam-To: <blockme@openss7.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sigtran/wdSRlULxGs0QKAtWwqg2x1AmM0o
Cc: sigtran@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Conceptual doubt between an ASP and SGP
X-BeenThere: sigtran@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: bidulock@openss7.org
List-Id: Signaling Transport <sigtran.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sigtran>,
<mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sigtran/>
List-Post: <mailto:sigtran@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran>,
<mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 07:17:39 -0000
Ajay, Please see comments below... Ajay Garg wrote: (Thu, 13 Mar 2014 11:48:19) > Hi all. > I am an absolute newbie in telecom domain, so kindly forgive me if I > sound incredibly stupid. > From what I understand, an ASP is a process running on an AS, and a SGP > is a process running on a SG. Not quite. See RFC 4666 "1.2 Terminology" for a definition of ASP, AS, SGP and SG. > Each ASP <-> SGP link is a SCTP connection. > Also, I understand that SGP is responsible for message-routing, while > an ASP is merely an end-point for a SCTP connection. > Given that, are there any extra differences between a ASP and SGP (in > addition to the routing-capabilities of a SGP)? > I will be grateful for any pointers/clarifications. RFC 4666 describes for 124 pages the differences between ASP and SGP. BTW, it is not an SGP per se that has routing capabilities, but an SG, where the SG is made up of some SGP, an SS7 stack and a interworking function. See also RFC 2719 "Framework Architecture for Signaling Transport" for a better overview of what's going on. --brian -- Brian F. G. Bidulock bidulock@openss7.org http://www.openss7.org/
- [Sigtran] Conceptual doubt between an ASP and SGP Ajay Garg
- Re: [Sigtran] Conceptual doubt between an ASP and… Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Sigtran] Conceptual doubt between an ASP and… Ajay Garg
- Re: [Sigtran] Conceptual doubt between an ASP and… David Laight
- Re: [Sigtran] Conceptual doubt between an ASP and… Ajay Garg
- Re: [Sigtran] Conceptual doubt between an ASP and… Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Sigtran] Conceptual doubt between an ASP and… Ajay Garg
- Re: [Sigtran] Conceptual doubt between an ASP and… Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Sigtran] Conceptual doubt between an ASP and… David Laight
- Re: [Sigtran] Conceptual doubt between an ASP and… Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Sigtran] Conceptual doubt between an ASP and… David Laight
- Re: [Sigtran] Conceptual doubt between an ASP and… Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Sigtran] Conceptual doubt between an ASP and… David Laight
- Re: [Sigtran] Conceptual doubt between an ASP and… Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Sigtran] Conceptual doubt between an ASP and… David Laight
- Re: [Sigtran] Conceptual doubt between an ASP and… Brian F. G. Bidulock
- Re: [Sigtran] Conceptual doubt between an ASP and… Ajay Garg
- Re: [Sigtran] Conceptual doubt between an ASP and… David Laight
- Re: [Sigtran] Conceptual doubt between an ASP and… Brian F. G. Bidulock