[Simple] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5261 (3465)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 18 January 2013 09:38 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ABD221F883F for <simple@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 01:38:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.352
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.352 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.248, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2E4cDfocZqlj for <simple@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 01:38:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B1521F84E7 for <simple@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 01:38:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 182ECB1E002; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 01:27:22 -0800 (PST)
To: jari.urpalainen@nokia.com, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com, rjsparks@nostrum.com, hisham.khartabil@gmail.com, ben@nostrum.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20130118092722.182ECB1E002@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 01:27:22 -0800
Cc: dret@berkeley.edu, simple@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Simple] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5261 (3465)
X-BeenThere: simple@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions <simple.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/simple>, <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/simple>
List-Post: <mailto:simple@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple>, <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:38:19 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5261, "An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Patch Operations Framework Utilizing XML Path Language (XPath) Selectors". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5261&eid=3465 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu> Section: 4.2.3 Original Text ------------- Lastly, if the above two rules still don't apply, first all in-scope namespace prefixes of the evaluation context node are arranged alphabetically in an ascending order. Corrected Text -------------- n/a Notes ----- It is not entirely clear what "arranged alphabetically" refers to in this section. Sorting can be done in a variety of ways, and while many environment may have standard sort orders, not all are the same and for this standard to be implement consistently it's important to clearly state what sort order the above sentence is referring to. The suggested fix for this erratum is to add text that clearly states which sorting method should be used. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5261 (draft-ietf-simple-xml-patch-ops-04) -------------------------------------- Title : An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Patch Operations Framework Utilizing XML Path Language (XPath) Selectors Publication Date : September 2008 Author(s) : J. Urpalainen Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Simple] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5261 (346… RFC Errata System