Re: [sip-clf] SIP CLF -> IPFIX?

[Benoit Claise <[e-mail]>]

Vijay,

> Benoit Claise wrote:
>> Hi Vijay,
>
> Benoit: Thanks for your interest in this.  One quick clarification
> inline.
>
>> During the OPSAREA, I asked you the following questions regarding 
>> your work at http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/75/slides/opsarea-2.pdf
>>
>> QUESTION: if I understand correctly, you want a way to define 
>> Information Element types?
>>
>>            Answer: Yes
>
> Just to be sure, we want to define a logging format -- which fields
> to include, how to ensure extensibility for future fields, etc.
> In that vein, it is not so much about Information Element *types*
> as it is about the choice and representation of the Information
> Elements themselves.
Sure. My mistake in choosing words

Regards, Benoit.
> I don't know if that is too fine a distinction
> or not, but probably worth a clarification.
>
> Once again, thank you for indulging us.
>
> - vijay