[sip-clf] conflict SIPCLF -> OPSAREA
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Fri, 05 November 2010 12:15 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AADD3A68C5 for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 05:15:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u3Ndp7aYOhSE for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 05:15:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBBE33A68BA for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 05:15:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oA5BJLPS022583; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 12:19:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [64.103.12.115] (dhcp-64-103-12-115.cisco.com [64.103.12.115]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oA5BJKci017851; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 12:19:20 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4CD3E838.60705@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 12:19:20 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: SIP-CLF Mailing List <sip-clf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Saverio Niccolini <Saverio.Niccolini@nw.neclab.eu>, Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
Subject: [sip-clf] conflict SIPCLF -> OPSAREA
X-BeenThere: sip-clf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list <sip-clf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-clf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 12:15:47 -0000
Dear all, I realized that there is a conflict in the agenda: SIPCLF -> OPSAREA, since SIPCLF was "Moved from Friday morning session I 0900-1130" I have to chose OPSAREA. For future meetings, we should avoid the conflict with some OPS related activities ... most importantly if IPFIX is selected as the protocol. Regards, Benoit.
- [sip-clf] conflict SIPCLF -> OPSAREA Benoit Claise
- Re: [sip-clf] conflict SIPCLF -> OPSAREA Cullen Jennings
- Re: [sip-clf] conflict SIPCLF -> OPSAREA Robert Sparks