Re: [sip-clf] WGLC: SIPCLF Problem Statement(draft-gurbani-sipclf-problem-statement-01)

["Spencer Dawkins" <[e-mail]>]

Just as a wake-up call, we're about halfway through WGLC, and I'm not seeing 
evidence onlist that people are reading this draft and agreeing that we 
should adopt it (or even that we should not adopt it).

I'm assuming that Cullen likes the current version, but his request to adopt 
was actually for the previous version of this draft. Other than Cullen, the 
only post I've seen was from Eric, who is one of the draft authors.

Theo and I are looking for actual statements of support for adopting drafts 
as working group items - in this case, silence is NOT consent.

Thanks,

Spencer


> Just to let people know, Theo and I agree that this draft should be 
> adopted as a working group draft. After a quick once-over, I think it's 
> solid enough to start WGLC now.
>
> WGLC will end on 2010/02/05, which gives nearly three weeks for people to 
> post and discuss comments on the mailing list.
>
> Once WGLC is completed, I will ask Vijay to post a draft-ietf-sipclf 00 
> version addressing WGLC comments. I hope to be able to request publication 
> for that version of the draft-ietf-sipclf version, so please don't be shy 
> about sending comments on the individual draft currently posted (at 
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-gurbani-sipclf-problem-statement-01.txt).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Spencer, as co-chair