IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sip-clf] Advantages of using an IPFIX File Format for SIPCLF

"Saverio Niccolini" <Saverio.Niccolini@nw.neclab.eu> Mon, 22 February 2010 11:16 UTC

Return-Path: <Saverio.Niccolini@nw.neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B9928C11D for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:16:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.855
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.855 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.745, BAYES_05=-1.11]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pWMS7Klee1uH for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:16:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp0.neclab.eu (smtp0.neclab.eu [195.37.70.41]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C4A28C0F1 for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:16:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp0.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 724CD2C019172 for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:18:42 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (atlas2.office)
Received: from smtp0.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas2.office [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4POUwiQqnCqR for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:18:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from VENUS.office (mx2.office [192.168.24.15]) by smtp0.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538862C017B2E for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:18:37 +0100 (CET)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:18:36 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=SHA1; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0050_01CAB3B9.28BDF5E0"
Message-ID: <547F018265F92642B577B986577D671C011CF2E4@VENUS.office>
In-Reply-To: <547F018265F92642B577B986577D671C011662CA@VENUS.office>
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [sip-clf] Advantages of using an IPFIX File Format for SIPCLF
Thread-Index: Acqph9gyRyb1K883R26Ur8K+sWMfFwKKMzoQ
References: <547F018265F92642B577B986577D671C011662CA@VENUS.office>
From: "Saverio Niccolini" <Saverio.Niccolini@nw.neclab.eu>
To: "SIP-CLF Mailing List" <sip-clf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sip-clf] Advantages of using an IPFIX File Format for SIPCLF
X-BeenThere: sip-clf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list <sip-clf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-clf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:16:45 -0000

Dear all,

did you have time to check this draft? we tried to post it in order 
to stimulate discussion on IPFIX usage for SIPCLF but I did not see 
much of a reaction...

Comments appreciated :-)

Saverio

============================================================
Dr. Saverio Niccolini
Manager, Real-Time Communications Group
NEC Laboratories Europe, Network Research Division     
Kurfuerstenanlage 36, D-69115 Heidelberg
Tel.     +49 (0)6221 4342-118
Fax:     +49 (0)6221 4342-155
e-mail:  saverio.niccolini@nw.neclab.eu
============================================================
NEC Europe Limited Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria
Road, London W3 6BL Registered in England 2832014

  


> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-clf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sip-clf-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Saverio Niccolini
> Sent: 09 February 2010 14:00
> To: SIP-CLF Mailing List
> Subject: [sip-clf] Advantages of using an IPFIX File Format for SIPCLF
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> as promised some time ago, I have just submitted a draft (coauthored by
> Benoit, Brian and Hadriel) entitled:
> 
> Advantages of using an IPFIX File Format for SIPCLF
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-niccolini-sipclf-ipfix-00.txt
> 
> I hope this draft can be used for discussion of the advantages of
> choosing one format with respect to others for SIPCLF.
> 
> Please note that we tried to give an example for how an IPFIX file
> format would look like just to give you an idea of that, the
> Information Elements needs careful discussion inside the WG that will
> need to happen, thus please refrain yourself from bashing on that right
> now.
> 
> Let us know if you have comments,
> Saverio
> 
> ============================================================
> Dr. Saverio Niccolini
> Manager, Real-Time Communications Group
> NEC Laboratories Europe, Network Research Division Kurfuerstenanlage
> 36, D-69115 Heidelberg Tel.     +49 (0)6221 4342-118
> Fax:     +49 (0)6221 4342-155
> e-mail:  saverio.niccolini@nw.neclab.eu
> ============================================================
> NEC Europe Limited Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road,
> London W3 6BL Registered in England 2832014
> 
> 
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email