Re: [sip-clf] Request for Consensus: Adopt ASCII

Gonzalo Salgueiro <gsalguei@cisco.com> Tue, 09 November 2010 22:13 UTC

Return-Path: <gsalguei@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF973A69A8 for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 14:13:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NR9GfTi+7gqC for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 14:13:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (hen.cisco.com [64.102.19.198]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90533A692E for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 14:13:52 -0800 (PST)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from rooster.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oA9MEFkO006668; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 17:14:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from rtp-vpn2-1131.cisco.com (rtp-vpn2-1131.cisco.com [10.82.244.107]) by rooster.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oA9MEF6H003390; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 17:14:15 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Gonzalo Salgueiro <gsalguei@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <1F0121A8-C73B-4018-AE81-4ED6EDDC2724@acmepacket.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:14:15 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <53BEFFB5-5647-43DE-AC24-6C9132E59854@cisco.com>
References: <D4134C23-AC3E-48E7-BFB4-1D51C2CA51EF@magorcorp.com> <06792DB6-BD48-42C9-B12F-639EA5E6E996@acmepacket.com> <6C54CABA-5BF0-4BA3-8845-1822023FF624@magorcorp.com> <1F0121A8-C73B-4018-AE81-4ED6EDDC2724@acmepacket.com>
To: Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: List SIP-CLF Mailing <sip-clf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sip-clf] Request for Consensus: Adopt ASCII
X-BeenThere: sip-clf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list <sip-clf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-clf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 22:13:53 -0000

It goes without saying, but nonetheless...

+1

Regards,

Gonzalo

On Nov 9, 2010, at 5:05 PM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:

> 
> OK, +1 for your consensus call count.  
> When Eric Burger speaks, I listen.
> 
> -hadriel
> 
> On Nov 9, 2010, at 4:51 PM, Peter Musgrave wrote:
> 
>> Correct.
>> 
>> On 2010-11-10, at 5:50 AM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> To be clear, you're asking for a consensus call on the sip-clf group to adopt *an* ascii format, not necessarily the indexed-ascii format as it stands right now in its draft, correct?
>>> 
>>> -hadriel
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Nov 9, 2010, at 4:34 PM, Peter Musgrave wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> [Background]
>>>> As has been clear for several sessions, there are two distinct communities of interest in the sip-clf:
>>>> - those who favour a apache-style text logging format
>>>> - those who prefer a binary IPFIX based format
>>>> 
>>>> In discussions with the IPFIX sub-group it was clear that they did not really desire a logging file format - this was a means to specify a format for streaming binary information to collectors and that they had additional goals which included the ability to correlate signalling information with information on media flows. 
>>>> 
>>>> As a consequence I suggested that this was a different enough objective that it would be appropriate to pursue it in either a re-chartered SIP-CLF or via the RAI dispatch process. 
>>>> 
>>>> This met with their agreement. 
>>>> 
>>>> This leaves ASCII as the default option for WG adoption for sip-clf. There was the start of a discussion about whether this indexing is still desired - but I feel we can have this discussion in the context of it as a WG document (if it is agreed to adopt it). 
>>>> 
>>>> [Consensus Call]
>>>> As discussed in the Beijing session, I would like to ask for a consensus call for the sip-clf group to adopt ascii as the format to proceed with under the present charter. 
>>>> 
>>>> Please reply with the next 7 days.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards, 
>>>> 
>>>> Peter Musgrave
>>>> Co-Chair SIP-CLF
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> sip-clf mailing list
>>>> sip-clf@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf
>>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sip-clf mailing list
> sip-clf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf