Re: [sip-clf] [sip-ops] [dispatch] SIP-CLF: Results on ASCII vs. binary representation

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Tue, 05 May 2009 17:01 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C31E3A6A66 for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 May 2009 10:01:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.061
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.061 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.539, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uEdcXYR9aJmL for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 May 2009 10:01:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2773A6D8B for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2009 10:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [25.193.66.20] (m7b0e36d0.tmodns.net [208.54.14.123]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n45H1PXr051597 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 5 May 2009 12:01:51 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <4A0070DE.7040502@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 12:01:18 -0500
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <WNQHYTPgGvwQ.rzn0RkdD@nylon.softarmor.com> <49FF48EE.8070705@nostrum.com> <7B9669B6-AAE1-4C4E-AA8E-CEA2895A9B4B@softarmor.com> <49FFD0C1.7090603@nostrum.com> <4A006321.7060709@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A006321.7060709@alcatel-lucent.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 208.54.14.123 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: "sip-clf@ietf.org" <sip-clf@ietf.org>, Tom Taylor <tom.taylor@rogers.com>, Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
Subject: Re: [sip-clf] [sip-ops] [dispatch] SIP-CLF: Results on ASCII vs. binary representation
X-BeenThere: sip-clf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list <sip-clf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-clf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 17:01:38 -0000

On 05/05/2009 11:02 AM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote:
>
> Adam: Is it possible to get a draft out on this format for
> further discussion?  I am willing to pitch in and help text
> out a draft with you, Dean and anyone else interested on the
> list.

Sure. I'm pretty busy until late this week, but I'll try to get 
something out as quickly as other work allows.

/a