[sip-clf] Changes for Problem Statement Doc
Peter Musgrave <peter.musgrave@magorcorp.com> Sun, 14 November 2010 10:42 UTC
Return-Path: <peter.musgrave@magorcorp.com>
X-Original-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC873A6B71 for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 02:42:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DaDPCnAt1+kN for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 02:42:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1563A6AEC for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 02:42:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iwn40 with SMTP id 40so5793718iwn.31 for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 02:42:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.42.205.193 with SMTP id fr1mr3368075icb.387.1289731358462; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 02:42:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.22.12.171] ([220.229.255.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d21sm6089478ibg.3.2010.11.14.02.42.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 14 Nov 2010 02:42:37 -0800 (PST)
From: Peter Musgrave <peter.musgrave@magorcorp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:42:33 +0800
Message-Id: <B091FA5A-F418-42C1-9BC0-0E25224E4691@magorcorp.com>
To: "sip-clf@ietf.org Mailing" <sip-clf@ietf.org>, "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Subject: [sip-clf] Changes for Problem Statement Doc
X-BeenThere: sip-clf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list <sip-clf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-clf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 10:42:01 -0000
Reviewing the rough minutes of the session in Beijing I see two actions for the WG doc and one issue: Decision 1) Limit is 4K per field Decision 2) Destination field will be an IP address. Issue: There was an issue about logging bodies. I see agreement that this does not need to be mandatory. I would suggest it could be incorporated into the log format in a TLV manner. Does anyone want to see words in the problem statement about e,g. what TLV should be used to log SDP? I think once we close on language for the above issue we're ready for WGLC. Opinions? Regards, Peter Musgrave (as co-chair)
- [sip-clf] Changes for Problem Statement Doc Peter Musgrave
- Re: [sip-clf] Changes for Problem Statement Doc Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [sip-clf] Changes for Problem Statement Doc Peter Musgrave