Re: [sip-clf] Please adopt draft-gurbani-sipclf-problem-statement

"Spencer Dawkins" <> Wed, 13 January 2010 17:56 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07F53A67EB for <>; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:56:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HWdFdFocw4sF for <>; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:56:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA7F3A688D for <>; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:56:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from S73602b ( []) by (node=mrus0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MUpZk-1NNXGt1028-00YckG; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:56:33 -0500
Message-ID: <>
From: "Spencer Dawkins" <>
To: "Cullen Jennings" <>
References: <>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:56:12 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX194qjEPfA920MNYC9mP1jGe+CNrEOkPMueKL7v WZeGjhCoQB3gZhSznSrrgbvO/y4qNj4AzhV+SZATQoEMjP/rLj PYisK3d1KTEDuikDK1ga54BsclZUwjY17nFxUFwDC8=
Cc: SIP-CLF Mailing List <>
Subject: Re: [sip-clf] Please adopt draft-gurbani-sipclf-problem-statement
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:56:38 -0000

Hi, Cullen,

> This document is a fine starting place for a WG problem statement doc. It 
> has been discussed for a long time, no one is contesting it being adopted 
> or proposing an alternative document. Let's just adopt the thing and get 
> on with the work. Seriously, we all know this document is going to be 
> adopted sooner or later. Why wait?
> Cullen <as an individual contributor>

Vijay says he's sending in an update this week - I was waiting for that to 
arrive before requesting adoption (and, to be honest, WGLC - if the document 
reflects what we said in Hiroshima and no one has been providing additional 
comments since Hiroshima, why the heck not? :-)

To the group - my apologies for being a slug; I've been focused on getting 
MARTINI chartered (and, to a lesser extent, getting the core documents in 
MEDIACTRL to Robert). Now that both of those things have happened, I'll have 
more time to spend with Theo on SIPCLF.

Thanks for your forebearance, and see you in Anaheim.