Re: [sip-clf] AD review: draft-ietf-sipclf-format-05

[Gonzalo Salgueiro <[e-mail]>]

On Feb 9, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote:

> On 02/09/2012 09:18 AM, Robert Sparks wrote:
>> Inline, trimming to points with responses
> 
> Robert: Some feedback on your responses inline.
> 
> With respect to extending the Transport flag, you wrote that:
> 
>> That's a choice the group should make - the document just needs to be
>> explicit about what's extensible (for all the fields) and if a field
>> is extensible, what the mechanism looks like. For the transport
>> field, as an individual contributor, I prefer the IANA registry
>> approach.
> 
> I agree that IANA is cleaner.  It will be nice if we hear more views
> from the WG so we can proceed accordingly.

I'll weigh in that I think the IANA registration route is more elegant and practical from an extensibility point of view.

Regards,

Gonzalo