Re: [sip-clf] AD review: draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-07

"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com> Fri, 02 December 2011 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <vkg@bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7B51F0C76 for <sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 09:57:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.421
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.421 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.178, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P7HCzmMRNFtS for <sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 09:57:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E091F0C36 for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 09:57:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usnavsmail1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.9]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id pB2HvhbV005798 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 2 Dec 2011 11:57:43 -0600 (CST)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail-ce2.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by usnavsmail1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id pB2Hvh4W015643 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 2 Dec 2011 11:57:43 -0600
Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (shoonya.ih.lucent.com [135.185.238.235]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id pB2HvgVG014400; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 11:57:43 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <4ED91262.8020808@bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 12:01:06 -0600
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111115 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
References: <856A6315-BB66-4575-9EFB-8725A9278DC9@nostrum.com> <4EBBF988.1030100@bell-labs.com> <1FFACD15-69E3-4B01-9CE7-CA6A15809EB8@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <1FFACD15-69E3-4B01-9CE7-CA6A15809EB8@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.37
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.9
Cc: SIP-CLF Mailing List <sip-clf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sip-clf] AD review: draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-07
X-BeenThere: sip-clf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list <sip-clf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-clf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:57:46 -0000

On 12/01/2011 05:16 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:
> Hi Vijay  -
>
> Thanks for the updated draft - comments inline and at the end.

Robert: Thanks for going through the draft; more inline.

> It really should change to reflect what the draft really is.
> It won't cause problems with the tools.
> The filename (draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement) does not need to change.
> Please issue a revision with this change.

Sure; I will do so in the next couple of days.

> Here's a minor tweak (only a suggestion, feel free to ignore it):
> Replace: [...]
>
> With: [...]

Sure; I will do so.

> One last micro-nit - Can you tune the timestamps in the examples so
> that you don't have "missing" retransmissions? For instance, in the
> last example, you leave the CANCEL pending long enough that it
> should have been resent.

Wow!  Now that is what I call a "close reading of the draft!"

Yes, sure; I will modify the timestamps of line 13 and 16 so
the difference is < 500ms.

I will issue a revision in the next couple of days with these changes.

Thanks, Robert.

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com
Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/