Re: [sip-clf] Request for Consensus: Adopt ASCII

Brian Trammell <trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch> Wed, 10 November 2010 00:04 UTC

Return-Path: <trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
X-Original-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A744828C10F for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 16:04:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I9zej9Lf3BLy for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 16:04:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch (smtp.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.219]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464FC3A6A25 for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 16:04:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BBCAD934F for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 01:04:37 +0100 (MET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new on smtp.ee.ethz.ch
Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.ee.ethz.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id CTT10tFg0AMB for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 01:04:37 +0100 (MET)
Received: from [172.31.14.241] (unknown [211.154.201.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: briant) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF999D934D for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 01:04:35 +0100 (MET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
From: Brian Trammell <trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
In-Reply-To: <53BEFFB5-5647-43DE-AC24-6C9132E59854@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 08:04:31 +0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C698E5EA-BA14-4906-B023-BAEB9D7D0954@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
References: <D4134C23-AC3E-48E7-BFB4-1D51C2CA51EF@magorcorp.com> <06792DB6-BD48-42C9-B12F-639EA5E6E996@acmepacket.com> <6C54CABA-5BF0-4BA3-8845-1822023FF624@magorcorp.com> <1F0121A8-C73B-4018-AE81-4ED6EDDC2724@acmepacket.com> <53BEFFB5-5647-43DE-AC24-6C9132E59854@cisco.com>
To: List SIP-CLF Mailing <sip-clf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Subject: Re: [sip-clf] Request for Consensus: Adopt ASCII
X-BeenThere: sip-clf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list <sip-clf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-clf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:04:17 -0000

+1

Cheers,

Brian

On Nov 10, 2010, at 6:14 AM, Gonzalo Salgueiro wrote:

> It goes without saying, but nonetheless...
> 
> +1
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Gonzalo
> 
> On Nov 9, 2010, at 5:05 PM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
> 
>> 
>> OK, +1 for your consensus call count.  
>> When Eric Burger speaks, I listen.
>> 
>> -hadriel
>> 
>> On Nov 9, 2010, at 4:51 PM, Peter Musgrave wrote:
>> 
>>> Correct.
>>> 
>>> On 2010-11-10, at 5:50 AM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> To be clear, you're asking for a consensus call on the sip-clf group to adopt *an* ascii format, not necessarily the indexed-ascii format as it stands right now in its draft, correct?
>>>> 
>>>> -hadriel
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Nov 9, 2010, at 4:34 PM, Peter Musgrave wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> [Background]
>>>>> As has been clear for several sessions, there are two distinct communities of interest in the sip-clf:
>>>>> - those who favour a apache-style text logging format
>>>>> - those who prefer a binary IPFIX based format
>>>>> 
>>>>> In discussions with the IPFIX sub-group it was clear that they did not really desire a logging file format - this was a means to specify a format for streaming binary information to collectors and that they had additional goals which included the ability to correlate signalling information with information on media flows. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> As a consequence I suggested that this was a different enough objective that it would be appropriate to pursue it in either a re-chartered SIP-CLF or via the RAI dispatch process. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> This met with their agreement. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> This leaves ASCII as the default option for WG adoption for sip-clf. There was the start of a discussion about whether this indexing is still desired - but I feel we can have this discussion in the context of it as a WG document (if it is agreed to adopt it). 
>>>>> 
>>>>> [Consensus Call]
>>>>> As discussed in the Beijing session, I would like to ask for a consensus call for the sip-clf group to adopt ascii as the format to proceed with under the present charter. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please reply with the next 7 days.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards, 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Peter Musgrave
>>>>> Co-Chair SIP-CLF
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> sip-clf mailing list
>>>>> sip-clf@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> sip-clf mailing list
>> sip-clf@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sip-clf mailing list
> sip-clf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf