[sip-clf] Problem statement revision post IESG review

"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com> Mon, 24 December 2012 21:29 UTC

Return-Path: <vkg@bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F4121F8630 for <sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 13:29:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.255
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.255 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.344, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4xtsracoF7LK for <sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 13:29:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ihemail2.lucent.com (ihemail2.lucent.com [135.245.0.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B14321F861B for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 13:29:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.12]) by ihemail2.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id qBOLTliW026394 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 15:29:48 -0600 (CST)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail-ce2.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id qBOLTl5v003173 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 15:29:47 -0600
Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (shoonya.ih.lucent.com [135.185.237.229]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id qBOLTkpN029853 for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 15:29:47 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <50D8C9B4.4050501@bell-labs.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 15:31:32 -0600
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "sip-clf@ietf.org" <sip-clf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.35
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.12
Subject: [sip-clf] Problem statement revision post IESG review
X-BeenThere: sip-clf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list <sip-clf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-clf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 21:29:50 -0000

All: I have posted a revision (-12) for the SIP CLF Problem Statement
draft that incorporates the IESG comments.

-12 can be accessed at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-12

The diff between -11 and -12 is at
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-12.txt

While most changes are editorial in nature, there are two changes that
I want to intimate the working group.

In S8.1, the following change was made based on an AD review:

OLD:
    From - The From URI. For the sake of brevity, URI parameters
    SHOULD NOT be logged.
    To - The To URI. For the sake of brevity, URI parameters SHOULD NOT
    be logged.

NEW:
    From - The From URI. For the sake of brevity, URI parameters
    should not be logged.
    To - The To URI. For the sake of brevity, URI parameters should not
    be logged.

For the purpose of the SIP CLF record, the To and From URIs and the
tags, as header parameters, are important.  Whether or not to log other
URI parameters depends on the implementation; certainly terseness
dictates that an unadorned To or From URI is easy for visualization
as the CLF records scroll by.

Please let me know if there are any concerns with respect to this
change.

Thank you,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com
Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/