Re: [sip-clf] draft CLF charter

"Juergen Quittek" <Quittek@nw.neclab.eu> Fri, 24 July 2009 07:29 UTC

Return-Path: <Quittek@nw.neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C369A28C122 for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57EuskZ9kAqG for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp0.neclab.eu (smtp0.neclab.eu [195.37.70.41]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392C33A691E for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp0.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C07442C0012C3; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:02:06 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (atlas2.office)
Received: from smtp0.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas2.office [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Nm0HXmAea4Y; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:02:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from VENUS.office (mx1.office [192.168.24.3]) by smtp0.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8258F2C0012C6; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:01:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from 10.1.2.178 ([10.1.2.178]) by VENUS.office ([192.168.24.102]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 07:01:36 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="B_3331270894_23373717"
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:01:33 +0200
Message-ID: <C68F28ED.6FC95%Quittek@nw.neclab.eu>
In-Reply-To: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A04018CF52F@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [sip-clf] draft CLF charter
thread-index: AcoLpuMqkgIFSKSsQTeLhL63r1we5QAAIS3gACFK9n8=
From: Juergen Quittek <Quittek@nw.neclab.eu>
To: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@avaya.com>, "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 05:46:07 -0700
Cc: Nevil Brownlee <n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz>, SIP-CLF Mailing List <sip-clf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sip-clf] draft CLF charter
X-BeenThere: sip-clf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list <sip-clf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-clf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 07:29:51 -0000

At the IPFIX session we will have a presentation of

    http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-huici-ipfix-sipfix-00.txt

It would be great to have both presentations together in the same session.
I would prefer to have both in IPFIX as a use case discussion.

As Dan said, at this point in time no background knowledge of the
IPFIX protocol would be required. But for both use case we could
receive good advice from the SIP experts on pros and cons of using IPFIX.

Thanks,

    Juergen


On 23.07.09 17:09  "Dan Romascanu" <dromasca@avaya.com> wrote:

> No expertise of IPFIX is required at this stage, I guess, but rather
> presenting the problem space and mentioning that IPFIX is considered as
> a possible solution or part of the solution for SIP-CLF. Stealing slides
> used in OPSAREA should be fine.
> 
> Dan
>  
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Vijay K. Gurbani [mailto:vkg@alcatel-lucent.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 6:04 PM
>> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
>> Cc: Theo Zourzouvillys; Spencer Dawkins; SIP-CLF Mailing
>> List; Nevil Brownlee; Juergen Quittek
>> Subject: Re: [sip-clf] draft CLF charter
>> 
>> Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
>>> It may be a good idea to have somebody from the SIP-CLF
>> crowd come to 
>>> the IPFIX meeting next week and make a five minutes presentation so
>>> that IPFIX folks are aware about this.
>> 
>> I am not an expert at ipfix, so if Theo, Hadriel, or Spencer
>> would rather make a presentation, that is fine.  Otherwise,
>> since I am making a presentation on SIP CLF at the opsarea
>> meeting anyway, I can quickly present a digested version of
>> that slide deck at ipfix.  Regardless of who makes the
>> presentation, I can share the opsarea SIP CLF slide deck so
>> we can beg, borrow or steal slides from it for ipfix.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> - vijay
>> --
>> Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 1960
>> Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
>> Email: vkg@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
>> Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
>>