Re: [sip-clf] draft CLF charter

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Mon, 20 July 2009 14:45 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-clf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9523A6C34 for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.367
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.367 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.232, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n6KwK5eXDbpn for <sip-clf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com (co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B863A6941 for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.43,234,1246852800"; d="scan'208";a="177421382"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 20 Jul 2009 10:44:56 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.12]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 20 Jul 2009 10:44:56 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:44:29 +0200
Message-ID: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0401892AF4@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <D5E606B8-0811-4D40-AA76-ED989B00FD02@nostrum.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [sip-clf] draft CLF charter
thread-index: AcoHI4kvZTPCiRUvRl6mSXW2RdOaGACI5ufg
References: <3B33A97D-7E19-4A08-A431-A085D53A2A6E@nostrum.com> <D5E606B8-0811-4D40-AA76-ED989B00FD02@nostrum.com>
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, sip-clf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sip-clf] draft CLF charter
X-BeenThere: sip-clf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list <sip-clf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-clf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:45:01 -0000

A few comments after the first reading of the charter. 

- Is it Common Log File as it appears at the first instance, or Common
Log Format? 
- What does 'efficient processing' mean? More clarity and details here
would be welcome (is it at client, at server, both? Is it efficiency on
storage, on transmission? etc.)
- Would it be useful to include (maybe as part of the problem statement
work, maybe as a separate item) a look at what is already available as
standards for logging events (e.g. syslog is discussing rechartering at
the same IETF meeting - can syslog format be used? pcap? Other? Are
there any initial proposals?)
- if the WG ends by doing both a bit-field oriented and a text-oriented
format will these end being separate deliverables? 

Dan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-clf-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:sip-clf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Robert Sparks
> Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2009 12:14 AM
> To: sip-clf@ietf.org
> Subject: [sip-clf] draft CLF charter
> 
> All -
> 
> We are working on forming a CLF working group based on 
> DISPATCH's decision.
> 
> Below is a proposed charter for this working group. Please 
> review and comment on this list. Depending on the feedback we 
> receive, we will target forming this group shortly after the 
> Stockholm meeting.
> 
> We'll also be discussing this in Thursday's opsarea meeting.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> RjS
> 
> 
> > The SIP Common Log File (CLF) working group is chartered to 
> define a 
> > standard logging format for systems processing SIP messages.
> >
> > Well-known web servers such as Apache and web proxies like Squid 
> > support event logging using a common log format.  The logs produced 
> > using these de-facto standard formats are invaluable to system 
> > administrators for trouble-shooting a server and tool 
> writers to craft 
> > tools that mine the log files to produce reports and trends and to 
> > search for a certain SIP message or messages, a transaction or a 
> > related set of transactions.  Furthermore, these log 
> records can also 
> > be used to train anomaly detection systems and feed events into a 
> > security event management system.
> >
> > The Session Initiation Protocol does not have a common log format. 
> > Diverse element provide distinct log formats making it complex to 
> > produce tools to analyze them.
> >
> > The CLF working group will produce a format suitable for 
> logging from 
> > any SIP element. The format will anticipate the need to 
> search, merge, 
> > and summarize the log records from diverse elements.
> > The format will anticipate the need to correlate messages from 
> > multiple elements related to a given request (that may fork) or a 
> > given dialog. The format will take SIP's extensibility into 
> > consideration, providing a way to represent SIP message components 
> > that are defined in the future.  The format will anticipate 
> being used 
> > both for off-line analysis and on-line real-time processing 
> > applications. The working group will consider the need for 
> efficient 
> > processing in its design of this format.
> >
> > The working group is not pre-constrained to producing either a 
> > bit-field oriented or text-oriented format, and may choose 
> to provide 
> > both. If the group chooses to specify both, it must be possible to 
> > mechanically translate between the formats without loss of 
> > information.
> >
> > Specifying the mechanics of exchanging, transporting, and 
> storing SIP 
> > Common Log Format records is explicitly out of scope. Specifying a 
> > real-time transfer mechanism for heuristic analysis is 
> explicitly out 
> > of scope.
> >
> > The group will generate:
> >
> > - A problem statement enunciating the motivation,  and use 
> cases for a 
> > SIP Common Log Format. This analysis  will identify the required 
> > minimal information that must  appear in any record.
> >
> > - A specification of the SIP Common Log Format record.
> >
> > The group will consider providing one or more reference 
> > implementations for decoding a CLF record.
> >
> > Goals and Milestones
> > ===========================
> >
> > Nov 09 - Problem statement, motivation, and use cases to IESG
> > (Informational)
> > Feb 10 - SIP Common Log Format specification to IESG (PS)
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sip-clf mailing list
> sip-clf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf
>