Re: [sip-clf] WGLC:draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-06.txt

Peter Musgrave <musgravepj@gmail.com> Sat, 04 June 2011 21:55 UTC

Return-Path: <musgravepj@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3808621F84F9 for <sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 14:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d9dlUthsBfqC for <sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 14:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E594621F84D0 for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 14:55:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so2108289fxm.31 for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 14:55:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=jqJuZXNokE9n7/iNbXziS+DNwMX+clTt9YI8enH2zyg=; b=c/YFpAohpYQO+XEmXSiRVOeDOtBRqYLghiHHNkk73AG71I0vFQFVlF/H6Ejt8ck3ml LQJZCul4Twh/Sa4DoTwJc9oRtpZdc/XJguML/95bMLok4orjtLXI5kPta42IQ4olpRvX c7UVanJ/JidLc6E07Pfk6NriLV1SSZpTaRcWU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=mZXAdOG00rIIdDM//T6agpkfMbQZH/lE7O4YFezbTbevi3V/x3CI+LNGv8z3GAreKt t80FBYDRQmwHrKwx/wUv1ian3MRAzOau+X8SY79AqCJ9Oh2exxyj3GM02XrmvamUVwOE 8pF6KaXQxuLaz2PCfuWhkdZ3wBOVG2VrzjxZI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.14.137 with SMTP id g9mr1583388faa.8.1307224521919; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 14:55:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.143.71 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 14:55:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4DE950A5.8080500@bell-labs.com>
References: <20110418143004.807.72505.idtracker@ietfc.amsl.com> <A4BBEEE4-4420-4A3A-BD0D-EE72430A6A64@magorcorp.com> <8CB1F01A-91E7-4A02-A984-718AEC84EE0B@magorcorp.com> <96B28772-470F-4010-A372-7432A43CBB0F@magorcorp.com> <4DE950A5.8080500@bell-labs.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 17:55:21 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTingjF8VDiBrZXLhSkS2M44SzbhL0A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Musgrave <musgravepj@gmail.com>
To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151747af3e454b9104a4e9ed0f
Cc: sip-clf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sip-clf] WGLC:draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-06.txt
X-BeenThere: sip-clf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list <sip-clf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-clf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 21:55:27 -0000

 Thanks Vijay.

Once we have the doc I will start the wheels turning to get this on to the
next step...

Peter

On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani <vkg@bell-labs.com> wrote:

> Peter, John: Thank you for reviewing
> draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-06 as part of WGLC.
>
> I am attending to both of your comments, as follows.
>
> Regarding Peter's comments in [1], I have put the following
> normative text for the From/To headers:
>
>  For the sake of brevity, URI parameters SHOULD NOT be logged.
>
> Also in [1], Peter asks whether it is necessary to indicate
> UAS-half and UAC-half.  I think it is best to leave them as
> stated, especially since in Table 1 there is a bit of a
> difference in how the UAS- and UAC-half treat a couple of
> headers (c.f., {Server-,Client-}Txn in the table).
>
> If you can suggest a better suffix instead of "half", I can
> easily use that.
>
> Finally in [1], regarding URI parameters MUST be logged: I
> have left the text as it currently appears in the draft
> ("The Request-URI, including any URI parameters.")  I think
> it is self-explanatory, but if anyone wants me to put
> normative language there, I can do so.
>
> Regarding Peter's comments in [2], the To URI should be the
> same as R-URI since it is a direct call.  I will make that
> change.
>
> Regarding John's comments in [3], I agree and have took the
> sentence that mentions the tag out.
>
> I will issue a new revision early next week.
>
> [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf/current/msg00497.html
> [2] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf/current/msg00499.html
> [3] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf/current/msg00498.html
>
> Thanks,
>
> - vijay
> --
> Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
> 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
> Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com
> Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
>