Re: [sip-clf] WGLC:draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-06.txt

[Peter Musgrave <[e-mail]>]

 Thanks Vijay.

Once we have the doc I will start the wheels turning to get this on to the
next step...

Peter

On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Peter, John: Thank you for reviewing
> draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-06 as part of WGLC.
>
> I am attending to both of your comments, as follows.
>
> Regarding Peter's comments in [1], I have put the following
> normative text for the From/To headers:
>
>  For the sake of brevity, URI parameters SHOULD NOT be logged.
>
> Also in [1], Peter asks whether it is necessary to indicate
> UAS-half and UAC-half.  I think it is best to leave them as
> stated, especially since in Table 1 there is a bit of a
> difference in how the UAS- and UAC-half treat a couple of
> headers (c.f., {Server-,Client-}Txn in the table).
>
> If you can suggest a better suffix instead of "half", I can
> easily use that.
>
> Finally in [1], regarding URI parameters MUST be logged: I
> have left the text as it currently appears in the draft
> ("The Request-URI, including any URI parameters.")  I think
> it is self-explanatory, but if anyone wants me to put
> normative language there, I can do so.
>
> Regarding Peter's comments in [2], the To URI should be the
> same as R-URI since it is a direct call.  I will make that
> change.
>
> Regarding John's comments in [3], I agree and have took the
> sentence that mentions the tag out.
>
> I will issue a new revision early next week.
>
> [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf/current/msg00497.html
> [2] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf/current/msg00499.html
> [3] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf/current/msg00498.html
>
> Thanks,
>
> - vijay
> --
> Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
> 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
> Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [e-mail]
> Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
>