Re: [sip-clf] AD review: draft-ietf-sipclf-format-05

Peter Musgrave <musgravepj@gmail.com> Thu, 16 February 2012 10:48 UTC

Return-Path: <musgravepj@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E24121F86C6 for <sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:48:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.407
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.407 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.192, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n6ffp78Cy+2j for <sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:48:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8250921F869E for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:48:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iagf6 with SMTP id f6so3294505iag.31 for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:48:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=phx24B50FgZ4R3YHxJtHVQftY2uPj3BIoQAgSiD3CUc=; b=i6ItgoGqJdBj157pLyg6sOvaTf5o88x5KjlaIMsq63e5ogUcwB78EeRJjdq8UOZnxe uTbK/k3fjlZ+rTaLOlZ2H3t5qeK+Ie7UaJoTQUg4dYA42AoJ5Jbd14lhvCBZOFBFTaiR qK3AVa/77Dyae+8F0fRCoS960VPGSvunXvMqk=
Received: by 10.43.44.69 with SMTP id uf5mr1667137icb.41.1329389314969; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:48:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.104] ([204.237.33.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f8sm10529500ibl.6.2012.02.16.02.48.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:48:34 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Peter Musgrave <musgravepj@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <446A716C-A606-4812-AD1E-5CB8739A9F2D@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 05:48:31 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <50CF086B-7495-43CF-8C6A-12AA67E2BF54@gmail.com>
References: <4F21DD3E.7000002@nostrum.com> <31A5C897-B767-4527-9346-905A80977F35@cisco.com> <4F33E3D0.7000605@nostrum.com> <4F340A33.7030606@bell-labs.com> <446A716C-A606-4812-AD1E-5CB8739A9F2D@cisco.com>
To: Gonzalo Salgueiro <gsalguei@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: "sip-clf@ietf.org" <sip-clf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sip-clf] AD review: draft-ietf-sipclf-format-05
X-BeenThere: sip-clf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list <sip-clf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-clf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 10:48:39 -0000

HI all, 

(as individual)

I think a registry is more future-proof. 

Peter

On 2012-02-09, at 4:01 PM, Gonzalo Salgueiro wrote:

> 
> On Feb 9, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote:
> 
>> On 02/09/2012 09:18 AM, Robert Sparks wrote:
>>> Inline, trimming to points with responses
>> 
>> Robert: Some feedback on your responses inline.
>> 
>> With respect to extending the Transport flag, you wrote that:
>> 
>>> That's a choice the group should make - the document just needs to be
>>> explicit about what's extensible (for all the fields) and if a field
>>> is extensible, what the mechanism looks like. For the transport
>>> field, as an individual contributor, I prefer the IANA registry
>>> approach.
>> 
>> I agree that IANA is cleaner.  It will be nice if we hear more views
>> from the WG so we can proceed accordingly.
> 
> I'll weigh in that I think the IANA registration route is more elegant and practical from an extensibility point of view.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Gonzalo
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sip-clf mailing list
> sip-clf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf