Re: [sip-ops] [dispatch] draft-lawrence-sip-3rd-party-authorization-00

"Dale Worley" <dworley@nortel.com> Fri, 12 June 2009 19:36 UTC

Return-Path: <dworley@nortel.com>
X-Original-To: sip-ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 958353A6858; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.67
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.67 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.071, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b1Xd3jw7it8z; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zcars04e.nortel.com (zcars04e.nortel.com [47.129.242.56]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0ED23A68CB; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com (casmtp.ca.nortel.com [47.140.202.46]) by zcars04e.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.0/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id n5CJZC110248; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:35:12 GMT
Received: from [47.16.90.165] ([47.16.90.165]) by zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:36:31 -0400
From: "Dale Worley" <dworley@nortel.com>
To: "Mary Barnes" <mary.barnes@nortel.com>
In-Reply-To: <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1E727FEF@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com>
References: <1241379400.3528.50.camel@scott> <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1E727FEF@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Nortel Networks
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:36:30 -0400
Message-Id: <1244835390.3768.62.camel@victoria-pingtel-com.us.nortel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-5.fc8)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jun 2009 19:36:31.0492 (UTC) FILETIME=[16619C40:01C9EB95]
Cc: SIP Operations <sip-ops@ietf.org>, RAI DISPATCH <dispatch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sip-ops] [dispatch] draft-lawrence-sip-3rd-party-authorization-00
X-BeenThere: sip-ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Operations <sip-ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-ops>, <mailto:sip-ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-ops>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-ops>, <mailto:sip-ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:36:29 -0000

On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 08:47 -0500, Mary Barnes wrote:
> There seems to be sufficient interest in this topic to warrant f2f
> agenda time in Stockholm. However, additional feedback prior to IETF-75
> is necessary to ensure that progress can be made in Stockholm. 

It looks like a good description of the problem.  Since the I-D is not
to discuss solutions, I'm not sure what there is to discuss until we
open the discussion to solutions.

Dale