Re: [sip-ops] [dispatch] [Sipping] SIP-CLF: Results on ASCII vs. binary representation

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Fri, 01 May 2009 12:39 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sip-ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6E528C50D; Fri, 1 May 2009 05:39:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.593
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.593 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.006, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gmlkDiF9kniT; Fri, 1 May 2009 05:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com (sj-iport-2.cisco.com [171.71.176.71]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3A328CD42; Fri, 1 May 2009 05:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.40,277,1238976000"; d="scan'208";a="160950704"
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 May 2009 12:23:18 +0000
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n41CNI9u014662; Fri, 1 May 2009 05:23:18 -0700
Received: from [192.168.4.177] (rcdn-fluffy-8711.cisco.com [10.99.9.18]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n41CNHml020189; Fri, 1 May 2009 12:23:17 GMT
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: "Elwell, John" <john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com>
In-Reply-To: <0D5F89FAC29E2C41B98A6A762007F5D001D4B064@GBNTHT12009MSX.gb002.siemens.net>
Impp: xmpp:cullenfluffyjennings@jabber.org
References: <49F864E8.20005@alcatel-lucent.com> <0D5F89FAC29E2C41B98A6A762007F5D001D4B064@GBNTHT12009MSX.gb002.siemens.net>
Message-Id: <217DAD6D-52BF-4E85-8BD3-6024C570B5D5@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 06:23:16 -0600
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=263; t=1241180598; x=1242044598; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fluffy@cisco.com; z=From:=20Cullen=20Jennings=20<fluffy@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[dispatch]=20[Sipping]=20SIP-CLF=3A=20R esults=20on=20ASCII=20vs.=20binary=20representation |Sender:=20; bh=XSjDlbWIOima53lP/CuYgFw8tzwFc+10x9hH7Z6f7eo=; b=OJcgP/aiFXIXrl1MNpZrqsgRP3U3DWiNPUr2ALLcJcqB0okhR0GE7xOE+Y YMmeO+q2U2S9dYMt9iq510up0E1YdfvyXPK7whVGRivAVsH4hFEPoC9/S0Cc 1JP+Kw48xG;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=fluffy@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; );
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 01 May 2009 07:20:53 -0700
Cc: dispatch@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sip-ops] [dispatch] [Sipping] SIP-CLF: Results on ASCII vs. binary representation
X-BeenThere: sip-ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Operations <sip-ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-ops>, <mailto:sip-ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-ops>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-ops>, <mailto:sip-ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 12:39:19 -0000

On Apr 29, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Elwell, John wrote:

> p.s. which list - DISPATCH or SIP-OPS?

Folks, please use DISPATCH for this for now.

Thanks,
Cullen <in my RAI AD role>

ANd in gneraly, please, don't cross post whole threads if at all  
posible.