IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sip-ops] [dispatch] SIP-CLF: Results on ASCII vs. binary representation

"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@alcatel-lucent.com> Thu, 30 April 2009 21:18 UTC

Return-Path: <vkg@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: sip-ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9DE93A6CA5; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.525
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.525 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.074, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DbytN7i5NO7I; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com (ihemail1.lucent.com [135.245.0.33]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F063A6C7D; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:18:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (h135-3-40-61.lucent.com [135.3.40.61]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id n3ULJONX012249 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:19:24 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [135.185.236.17] (il0015vkg1.ih.lucent.com [135.185.236.17]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id n3ULJNWr004146; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:19:23 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <49FA15DB.2070108@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:19:23 -0500
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@alcatel-lucent.com>
Organization: Bell Labs Security Technology Research Group
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
References: <49F864E8.20005@alcatel-lucent.com> <49FA100B.2050105@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <49FA100B.2050105@viagenie.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.33
Cc: sip-ops@ietf.org, dispatch@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sip-ops] [dispatch] SIP-CLF: Results on ASCII vs. binary representation
X-BeenThere: sip-ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Operations <sip-ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-ops>, <mailto:sip-ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-ops>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-ops>, <mailto:sip-ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:18:04 -0000

Simon Perreault wrote:
> And I'm surprised nobody mentioned already that C would be MUCH
> faster than Perl.

Simon: Yes, that is always true.  However, I think we should
keep in mind who the ultimate consumer of the log file will be.
And a big constituency is enterprises, academia, small
businesses, etc.  Most of the people who feed the IT-type
infrastructure in such places are far more comfortable with
perl and python than C/C++.

Thanks,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: vkg@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email