[sip-ops] Plea for SIP-OPS Clue - SIPCLF

"Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@wonderhamster.org> Fri, 29 January 2010 13:32 UTC

Return-Path: <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
X-Original-To: sip-ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373AC3A67AD for <sip-ops@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 05:32:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.362
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.362 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.237, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nXrmBskabaQ0 for <sip-ops@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 05:32:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.195]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A843A672E for <sip-ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 05:32:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from S73602b (cpe-76-182-230-135.tx.res.rr.com [76.182.230.135]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus4) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Lh70R-1O6K2g0lKZ-00oL78; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 08:33:07 -0500
Message-ID: <E28DD4BB7DD846C2B5130B905BCDCFD8@china.huawei.com>
From: "Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
To: <sip-ops@ietf.org>
References: <618e24240907030640k2898f908s450626af73dad5f8@mail.gmail.com><1248374452.4427.14.camel@victoria-pingtel-com.us.nortel.com><618e24240907240734o78c758eds1578a27e9811ab00@mail.gmail.com> <58921C257EA84F0A87C46634E5952A82@china.huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 07:32:56 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/WKDBjDD4oq++TQ5EVlwoFSYgPb9LE//XNwg/ zqIbi6k60TU7gF7qDDACjJg2r7YHJuIpWi1Di1XGQdFyEuWDC4 o6JtuFlrvT1Ox8webtPYoJd1nlM1f06T3IcevFJl4Q=
Subject: [sip-ops] Plea for SIP-OPS Clue - SIPCLF
X-BeenThere: sip-ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Operations <sip-ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-ops>, <mailto:sip-ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-ops>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-ops>, <mailto:sip-ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:32:47 -0000

Dear SIP-OPS folk,

The IETF SIPCLF working group has been chartered to develop a SIP Common Log 
Format, analogous to Apache CLF. Charter is at 
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/sipclf/charters.

As of this moment, that's the ONLY thing we're chartered to produce - so you 
could log onto a SIP box and "tail" or "grep" the logs, and kind of know 
what you'd expect to see, but considerations about correlating logs from 
multiple boxes, moving log entries to a management platform, etc. are out of 
scope.

We're looking at a variety of approaches here, and Theo and I would like to 
have your input about what would really get used by SIP operators. For 
instance, we might use an IPFIX or SYSLOG format, to inherit infrastructure 
so that SIPCLF would just be part of the management infrastructure. We'd 
love to know what operators think!

Please take a look at 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf/current/maillist.html, and let 
us know what you think (on the SIPCLF mailing list, of course).

Subscription information is at 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf.

We would also love to hear from you about the SIPCLF problem statement, 
currently in WGLC for adoption - it's at 
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-gurbani-sipclf-problem-statement-01.txt.

Thanks!

Spencer, as SIPCLF co-chair