Re: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control - Christer's comments

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Thu, 27 June 2013 16:54 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A0F21F9E6F; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 09:54:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id snHZGxL0RWuI; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 09:54:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg20.ericsson.net (sesbmg20.ericsson.net [193.180.251.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDDCE21F9E6E; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 09:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb38-b7fc16d000004a21-34-51cc6e497680
Received: from ESESSHC001.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by sesbmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 14.02.18977.94E6CC15; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:54:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.6]) by ESESSHC001.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.21]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:54:33 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com>
Thread-Topic: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control - Christer's comments
Thread-Index: AQHOczrT1w3Hmm/e1EGQ/w9jZmCJP5lJu3tA
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:54:33 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3BCAE7@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3BC5DA@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <OFDCD0F58B.62419D81-ON85257B97.004A14F0-85257B97.004A6779@csc.com>
In-Reply-To: <OFDCD0F58B.62419D81-ON85257B97.004A14F0-85257B97.004A6779@csc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: fi-FI
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.146]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3BCAE7ESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrALMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvra5n3plAg7Pd5hYXdhxjtTj38Aur RfvFrawW+58mOLB4XLwe5bFkyU8mjy+XP7MFMEdx2aSk5mSWpRbp2yVwZWzuesJc8KK44udl 1wbGGwVdjJwcEgImErNaJjFB2GISF+6tZ+ti5OIQEjjKKPFm6lp2kISQwCJGiS/zTLsYOTjY BCwkuv9pg4RFBBQlfn1cyAhSzyzwnlHiZOcMRpAaYYE4ibPtXhA18RI3pm9jhrCNJCbvmsUG YrMIqEq8nbUDLM4r4Cvx9+ZvqL2TGSUa93eCHcQpECDx5+wlMJsR6Ljvp9aA2cwC4hIfDl5n hjhaQGLJnvNQtqjEy8f/WCFsJYkfGy6xQNTnSzx6vIkdYpmgxMmZT1gmMIrOQjJqFpKyWUjK ZgG9wyygKbF+lz5EiaLElO6H7BC2hkTrnLnsyOILGNlXMXIUpxYn5aYbGWxiBMbawS2/LXYw Xv5rc4hRmoNFSZx3i96ZQCGB9MSS1OzU1ILUovii0pzU4kOMTBycUg2MlVXC7G5S94K8f92U fve5/XXFpAq5wso/Il8eX94WErtmS4zLA26uh/xzPkq1qD0uYFzu4fw2Q/3jizcvsx9O016r nnX+vqL0SfFQPwkfZqU/M1/PsbpsduHBvz9NgoG1uxcGirS2bok/sbzWLmVHYLOmSN+UrGX2 p79NeWfNf5bdr2R14/knSizFGYmGWsxFxYkAtID5lYMCAAA=
Cc: "sip-overload-bounces@ietf.org" <sip-overload-bounces@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control.all@tools.ietf.org>, "sip-overload@ietf.org" <sip-overload@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control - Christer's comments
X-BeenThere: sip-overload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Overload <sip-overload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sip-overload>, <mailto:sip-overload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-overload>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-overload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-overload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-overload>, <mailto:sip-overload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:54:51 -0000

Hi,

>The IANA considerations section of  draft-ietf-soc-overload-control registers the new Via header field parameters.
>
>Is it needed here as well?

The draft (Section 5) does extend the oc parameter, doesn’t it? I would assume that needs to go to IANA.

Regards,

Christer


sip-overload-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:sip-overload-bounces@ietf.org> wrote on 06/27/2013 06:05:41 AM:

> From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com<mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>>
> To: "sip-overload@ietf.org<mailto:sip-overload@ietf.org>" <sip-overload@ietf.org<mailto:sip-overload@ietf.org>>
> Cc: "draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control.all@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control.all@tools.ietf.org>"
> <draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control.all@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control.all@tools.ietf.org>>
> Date: 06/27/2013 06:05 AM
> Subject: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control -
> Christer's comments
> Sent by: sip-overload-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:sip-overload-bounces@ietf.org>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have read draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control-04.txt as part of the WGLC.
>
...
> Q7: In Section 7 you say that there are no IANA considerations. But,
> don’t you need to request IANA to register the new Via header field
> parameters?
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> sip-overload mailing list
> sip-overload@ietf.org<mailto:sip-overload@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-overload