Re: [sip-overload] draft-ietf-soc-load-control-event-package-01.txt

Charles Shen <charles@cs.columbia.edu> Mon, 18 July 2011 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <charles.newyork@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B7621F8C69 for <sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 08:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5fFBlHymcBwE for <sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 08:43:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2EBA21F8BDC for <sip-overload@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 08:43:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so3452474iwn.31 for <sip-overload@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 08:43:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4L8N48TxdXaY7vvmp4hKOKdcUff5NgOLzE7DsgGXJc4=; b=wY2UaKoTTKYrQeTu+ZPofmtkz9DezBrkAxzlTLHgHxeYe/6p3LlQq/OU3sVyEWysFP mMgQhj9oH1KvLP92ezNnjB/LYcfqWwWsJ25hPF7Jo+nrCBLeueyaTDfHc5MH+9HzdK5g UXPK0U3hK6cQyoLHcs0/kpEHHliK3q0/06RmU=
Received: by 10.42.28.10 with SMTP id l10mr7911335icc.299.1311003790177; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 08:43:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: charles.newyork@gmail.com
Received: by 10.42.179.201 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 08:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Charles Shen <charles@cs.columbia.edu>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:42:50 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: vwsNxtLqn8zupaMBjBwdZskadCA
Message-ID: <CAPSQ9ZWCZ=ZioLaOks=ZSuU35sjDOrqZ8T=MX3CJ5fTAYfO+aw@mail.gmail.com>
To: sip-overload@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Volker Hilt <volker.hilt@alcatel-lucent.com>, Arata Koike <koike.arata@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
Subject: Re: [sip-overload] draft-ietf-soc-load-control-event-package-01.txt
X-BeenThere: sip-overload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Overload <sip-overload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sip-overload>, <mailto:sip-overload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-overload>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-overload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-overload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-overload>, <mailto:sip-overload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:43:16 -0000

Hi all

I am re-sending a request for comments on the load control event
package draft: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-soc-load-control-event-package-01.txt

Minutes from the last IETF indicates "the need to refine the texts in
section 9 (RFC5390requirements).", we would appreciate people posting
more details about their thoughts so we can make necessary adjustments
and move forward.

Thanks

Charles




On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Salvatore Loreto
<salvatore.loreto at ericsson.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> below the notes from the SoC session during the IETF80 meeting in Prague.
> (I have already uploaded this initial version to ietf proceeding site)
>
> Please review them and submit any correction to the chairs by May 11.
> The chairs have to send the notes toproceedings at ietf.org Âby May18th.
>
> (many thanks to Partha for taking notes during the meeting)
>
> cheers
> /Sal
>
> --
> Salvatore Loreto
> www.sloreto.com
>
>

snipped

> Load control Event package (Presenter: Arate Koike)
> -------------------------
> Some people expressed the need to refine the texts in
> section 9 (RFC5390 requirements).
>
>
>

snipped