[sip-overload] Introduction - "This document defines..." Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-soc-overload-control-12
Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com> Thu, 21 February 2013 22:20 UTC
Return-Path: <jgunn6@csc.com>
X-Original-To: sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 288B421E8098; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:20:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.791
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.791 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.193,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q1hYqghb4MNw;
Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:20:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail171.messagelabs.com (mail171.messagelabs.com
[216.82.253.243]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB35F21E8093;
Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:20:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Env-Sender: jgunn6@csc.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-7.tower-171.messagelabs.com!1361485228!17405266!1
X-Originating-IP: [20.137.2.88]
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 6.8.6; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 8379 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2013 22:20:29 -0000
Received: from amer-mta102.csc.com (HELO amer-mta102.csc.com) (20.137.2.88) by
server-7.tower-171.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP;
21 Feb 2013 22:20:29 -0000
Received: from amer-gw09.amer.csc.com (amer-gw09.amer.csc.com [20.6.39.245])
by amer-mta102.csc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id
r1LMKRnc029819; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:20:27 -0500
In-Reply-To: <51189F14.6050405@ericsson.com>
References: <51110A56.7030402@ericsson.com> <51189F14.6050405@ericsson.com>
To: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 9BD195B0:FEE31A3A-85257B19:007A01D4; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.2FP4 SHF97 March 26, 2012
From: Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com>
Message-ID: <OF9BD195B0.FEE31A3A-ON85257B19.007A01D4-85257B19.007AB86B@csc.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:20:25 -0500
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on AMER-GW09/SRV/CSC(Release 8.5.2FP3
HF204|September 20, 2011) at 02/21/2013 05:15:12 PM,
Serialize complete at 02/21/2013 05:15:12 PM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=_alternative 007AB82585257B19_="
Cc: sip-overload-bounces@ietf.org, Volker Hilt <volker.hilt@alcatel-lucent.com>,
"sip-overload@ietf.org" <sip-overload@ietf.org>
Subject: [sip-overload] Introduction - "This document defines..." Re: WG Last
Call for draft-ietf-soc-overload-control-12
X-BeenThere: sip-overload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Overload <sip-overload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sip-overload>,
<mailto:sip-overload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-overload>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-overload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-overload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-overload>,
<mailto:sip-overload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:20:31 -0000
OK, finally getting to this.
In section 1, the last paragraph ("this document defines...") seems to
miss the main point, which is a protocol for COMMUNICATING overload
information.
Therefore, I would suggest changing
" This document defines the general behaviour of SIP servers and
clients involved in overload control in Section 5. In addition,
Section 6 specifies a loss-based overload control scheme. SIP
clients and servers conformant to this specification MUST implement
the loss-based overload control scheme. They MAY implement other
overload control schemes as well."
to
" This document defines the protocol for communicating overload
information between SIP servers and clients, so that clients can reduce
the volume of traffic sent to overloaded servers, avoiding congestion
collapse, and increasing usefull throughput. Section 4 describes the
Via header parameters used for this communication. The general
behaviour of SIP servers and clients involved in overload control
is described in Section 5. In addition,
Section 6 specifies a loss-based overload control scheme. SIP
clients and servers conformant to this specification MUST implement
the loss-based overload control scheme. They MAY implement other
overload control schemes as well."
Janet
From: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
To: "sip-overload@ietf.org" <sip-overload@ietf.org>
Cc: Volker Hilt <volker.hilt@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: 02/11/2013 02:35 AM
Subject: Re: [sip-overload] WG Last Call for
draft-ietf-soc-overload-control-12
Sent by: sip-overload-bounces@ietf.org
this is just a reminder for this WG Last Call
I haven't seen yet any comment or feedback
please we really need you spend some time to reading and reviewing the
draft
thanks a lot
Salvatore
On 2/5/13 3:34 PM, Salvatore Loreto wrote:
Dear WG partecipants,
Volker and I would like to initiate a second 2 weeks WG Last Call on
draft-ietf-soc-overload-control-12 (" Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
Overload Control")
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-soc-overload-control-12.txt
The first WGLC that we run (
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-overload/current/msg00731.html )
has produced a significant amount of feedback and comments that have been
discussed and addressed in subsequent versions
Please send your reviews, as well as expression of support regarding
document readiness for IESG (or not) either to the *soc* mailing list (
sip-overload@ietf.org),
or directly to the WG chairs (Murray Kucherawy and myself).
Comments like "I've read the document and it is Ok to publish" or
"I've read the document and it has the following issues"
are useful and would be gratefully accepted by chairs.
The WG LC will end on Friday, February 19th.
Thank you,
Salvatore as an SoC co-chair.
_______________________________________________
sip-overload mailing list
sip-overload@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-overload
- [sip-overload] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-soc-ov… Salvatore Loreto
- Re: [sip-overload] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-so… Salvatore Loreto
- Re: [sip-overload] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-so… bruno.chatras
- Re: [sip-overload] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-so… Atle Monrad
- Re: [sip-overload] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-so… NOEL, ERIC (ERIC C)
- [sip-overload] Introduction - "This document defi… Janet P Gunn
- [sip-overload] Sec 5.8 Re: WG Last Call for draft… Janet P Gunn
- [sip-overload] Sec 5 and 6 Re: WG Last Call for d… Janet P Gunn
- Re: [sip-overload] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-so… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [sip-overload] Introduction - "This document … Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [sip-overload] Sec 5.8 Re: WG Last Call for d… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [sip-overload] Sec 5 and 6 Re: WG Last Call f… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [sip-overload] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-so… bruno.chatras
- Re: [sip-overload] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-so… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [sip-overload] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-so… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [sip-overload] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-so… NOEL, ERIC C (ERIC C)