Re: [sip-overload] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-soc-overload-control-12

[Atle Monrad <[e-mail]>]

G'day

The draft is a 3GPP Rel-11 dependency that I support going forward.

I've read through the draft and have no real comments.

However, I find the statement in section 5.10.2 a bit odd

  .... It would be fair to devote the same amount
   of processing at the overloaded server to the combination of
   rejection and processing from a non-participating client as the
   overloaded server would devote to processing requests from a
   participating client.  This is to ensure that SIP clients that do not
   support this specification don't receive an unfair advantage over
   those that do.
Personally I would have used a term like "local policy" for such decisions and not the current guidance given in a the current "fair to devote" fashion ...

I'd like to see the draft progressing.

thanks
/atle

________________________________


Atle Monrad
3GPP CT Chairman
Standardization and Regulation,
Group Function Technology and Portfolio Management
Ericsson


From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Salvatore Loreto
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 2:35 AM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Volker Hilt
Subject: Re: [sip-overload] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-soc-overload-control-12

this is just a reminder for this WG Last Call

I haven't seen yet any comment or feedback
please we really need you spend some time to reading and reviewing the draft

thanks a lot
Salvatore

On 2/5/13 3:34 PM, Salvatore Loreto wrote:
Dear WG partecipants,


Volker and I would like to initiate a second 2 weeks WG Last Call on
draft-ietf-soc-overload-control-12 (" Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Overload Control")
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-soc-overload-control-12.txt

The first WGLC that we run ( http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-overload/current/msg00731.html )
has produced a significant amount of feedback and comments that have been discussed and addressed in subsequent versions

Please send your reviews, as well as expression of support regarding
document readiness for IESG (or not) either to the *soc* mailing list ([e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>),
or directly to the WG chairs (Murray Kucherawy and myself).

Comments like "I've read the document and it is Ok to publish" or
"I've read the document and it has the following issues"
are useful and would be gratefully accepted by chairs.


The WG LC will end on Friday, February 19th.


Thank you,
Salvatore as an SoC co-chair.