Re: [sip-overload] Local Policy Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-soc-load-control-event-package-05.txt

My personal thought is that in each case, it would refer to the Overload 
Algorithm(s) in effect at that node.

But that brings up a whole can of worms about interaction between 
algorithms..

If the Event package has set up an a-priori Overload  Control, and then an 
actual overload triggers a "feedback" Overload Control, how do they 
interact?  The max? the min? the "product"

Is that a can of worms we want to open at this point?

Janet

charles.newyork@gmail.com wrote on 01/14/2013 11:36:34 AM:

> From: Charles Shen <charles@cs.columbia.edu>
> To: Volker Hilt <volker.hilt@alcatel-lucent.com>om>, Janet P Gunn/USA/
> CSC@CSC, "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
> Cc: sip-overload@ietf.org
> Date: 01/14/2013 11:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [sip-overload] Local Policy Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-
> soc-load-control-event-package-05.txt
> Sent by: charles.newyork@gmail.com
> 
> Hi Volker, Janet and Vijay,
> 
> Since we are talking about putting the same texts in the
> overload-control and event-package draft, would it be better to
> clarify a bit about "the SIP Overload Algorithm" in this sentence?
> 
> "It is expected a SIP client will follow local policy
> as long as the result is consistent with the SIP Overload Algorithm."
> 
> Specifically, are we referring to mechanisms in both drafts (and in
> that case, should we add cross reference to them?) as well as any
> future Overload Algorithms?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Charles
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Volker Hilt
> <volker.hilt@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> > Vijay,
> >
> > the sentence Janet has proposed works for me. You can replace the 
sentence I
> > had suggested after the first paragraph with Janets proposal.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Volker
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 14.01.2013 17:15, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote:
> >>
> >> On 01/14/2013 10:09 AM, Volker Hilt wrote:
> >>>
> >>> That works for me!
> >>
> >>
> >> Volker: Can either you or Janet please propose the exact wordings
> >> to go into the modified text I proposed in [1]?  This will avoid
> >> any guesswork and expedite the process of getting the drafts out.
> >>
> >> [1]
> >> 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-overload/current/msg00885.html
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> - vijay
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sip-overload mailing list
> > sip-overload@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-overload