[sip-overload] draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control-01.txt posted

"NOEL, ERIC C (ERIC C)" <ecnoel@research.att.com> Thu, 08 March 2012 19:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ecnoel@research.att.com>
X-Original-To: sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90EE21F84E0 for <sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 11:45:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1SRgeDiKt4DA for <sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 11:45:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pink.research.att.com (mail-pink.research.att.com [192.20.225.111]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B99A621F84DA for <sip-overload@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 11:45:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.178.11]) by mail-pink.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83BE01200F5 for <sip-overload@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 14:45:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from njfpsrvexg1.research.att.com (njfpsrvexg1.research.att.com [135.207.177.20]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23E5EF654 for <sip-overload@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 14:45:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from concierge.research.att.com (135.207.179.20) by njfpsrvexg1.research.att.com (135.207.177.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.245.1; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 14:44:11 -0500
Received: from njfpsrvexg6.research.att.com ([fe80:0000:0000:0000:a8f7:a94a:213.189.254.11]) by concierge.research.att.com ([135.207.24.83]) with mapi; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 14:44:43 -0500
From: "NOEL, ERIC C (ERIC C)" <ecnoel@research.att.com>
To: "sip-overload@ietf.org" <sip-overload@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 14:46:03 -0500
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control-01.txt posted
Thread-Index: Acz9ZF+ejDKcvE9YR02Ki5tPZSxy2Q==
Message-ID: <2F8FB48C17221643AD77FA295756D2A72406223070@njfpsrvexg6.research.att.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2F8FB48C17221643AD77FA295756D2A72406223070njfpsrvexg6re_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [sip-overload] draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control-01.txt posted
X-BeenThere: sip-overload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Overload <sip-overload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sip-overload>, <mailto:sip-overload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-overload>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-overload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-overload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-overload>, <mailto:sip-overload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 19:45:25 -0000

Folks,



Just to let you know updated version for draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control-01.txt was just posted. It addresses a problem in the client operation caught by Janet Gunn and provides more insights from Phil Williams on server rate estimation within the context of priority at the server.



Document may be found at:



A URL for this Internet-Draft is:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control



Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:

ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/


As this is a companion to draft-ietf-soc-overload-control-07, please review both drafts in parallel.



Thanks,

Eric Noel
AT&T Labs, Inc.
Rethink Possible

Network Design and Performance Analysis
200 South Laurel Avenue, D5-3D19
Middletown, NJ 07748
P: 732.420.4174
ecnoel@att.com<mailto:jsmith@att.com>