Re: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control - Christer's comments
Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Thu, 27 June 2013 19:42 UTC
Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3E221F9F1B; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:42:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vyQ5Uz3Y16cI; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg20.ericsson.net (sesbmg20.ericsson.net [193.180.251.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0E621F9F28; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb38-b7fc16d000004a21-9e-51cc95908513
Received: from ESESSHC014.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by sesbmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id DF.99.18977.0959CC15; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 21:42:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.6]) by ESESSHC014.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.60]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 21:42:08 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com>
Thread-Topic: VS: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control - Christer's comments
Thread-Index: AQHOc2kmjSJ+wIJmMECYC+CMynMaqJlJ8PGw
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 19:42:07 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3BCE34@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3BC5DA@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <OFDCD0F58B.62419D81-ON85257B97.004A14F0-85257B97.004A6779@csc.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3BCAE7@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <OF862EE4DA.6D4BA634-ON85257B97.00638E9A-85257B97.0068C179@csc.com>
In-Reply-To: <OF862EE4DA.6D4BA634-ON85257B97.00638E9A-85257B97.0068C179@csc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: fi-FI
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.146]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3BCE34ESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrCLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvre6EqWcCDc7cNbG4sOMYq8W5h19Y LdovbmW12P80wYHF4+L1KI8lS34yeXy5/JktgDmKyyYlNSezLLVI3y6BK2Pni4UsBX++MlXs /9XE1MA45w1TFyMnh4SAicTzG19ZIWwxiQv31rN1MXJxCAkcZZT4suwZI4SziFGi/ewUoA4O DjYBC4nuf9ogDSICihK/Pi4Eq2EWeM8ocbJzBiNIQlggSeJd63I2iKJkiYk9O5lBekUEjCQe /SgECbMIqEo0P3sBtphXwFfiy47fLBC75jJJbL3QBDaHUyBA4tPCBWBzGIGu+35qDdjVzALi Eh8OXmeGuFpAYsme81C2qMTLx/+gvlGS+LHhEgtEfb7E09e/mSCWCUqcnPmEZQKj6Cwko2Yh KZuFpGwW0NnMApoS63fpQ5QoSkzpfsgOYWtItM6Zy44svoCRfRUjR3FqcVJuupHBJkZgzB3c 8ttiB+PlvzaHGKU5WJTEebfonQkUEkhPLEnNTk0tSC2KLyrNSS0+xMjEwSnVwFiQdkaj1ncf 378JGrLXA76Fr/pz8dGfYIGV0b4B1qsuNp+YnKg1nWdtqX1Qz9cVpffjZeqf37wqMc1V4k9w 9YRVumI7Hkw5dvij3S93Jteln/sqHXS9VNTtfS9zHpcRud9qEhS6IZqv0m+WRu+yUAYNlQ++ vpf3XfLzfrzucI9BWzGrxLQH2kosxRmJhlrMRcWJAIXiQdqHAgAA
Cc: "sip-overload-bounces@ietf.org" <sip-overload-bounces@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control.all@tools.ietf.org>, "sip-overload@ietf.org" <sip-overload@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control - Christer's comments
X-BeenThere: sip-overload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Overload <sip-overload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sip-overload>, <mailto:sip-overload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-overload>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-overload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-overload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-overload>, <mailto:sip-overload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 19:42:16 -0000
Hi, When taking a closer look, I actually think there is something technically wrong with the syntax in Section 5 of draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control. draft-ietf-soc-overload-control defines the oc parameter as: oc = "oc" [EQUAL oc-num] Now, it seems like draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control actually re-defines the same parameter. In addition, it’s done in a backward compatible manner, e.g. because the parameter can now contain a non-numeric value (see the bullet list below what can go wrong): oc = "oc" EQUAL oc-value The following can happen: 1. If an entity that supports draft-ietf-soc-overload-control receives “oc=NaN” it will reject it, as it expects a numeric value. 2. If an entity that supports draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control receives “oc” it will reject it, as it expects an oc-value. But, in draft-ietf-soc-overload-control the usage of oc-value is optional. One way to fix this could be to define oc-value as a separate Via header field parameter (similar to oc-validity, oc-seq etc), instead of a value of the oc parameter. But, then you would have oc-num Another way is to change the syntax in draft-ietf-soc-overload-control , in order to allow what you want to do in draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control. Regards, Christer Lähettäjä: Janet P Gunn [mailto:jgunn6@csc.com] Lähetetty: 27. kesäkuuta 2013 22:04 Vastaanottaja: Christer Holmberg Kopio: draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control.all@tools.ietf.org; sip-overload@ietf.org; sip-overload-bounces@ietf.org Aihe: Re: VS: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control - Christer's comments Christer draft-ietf-soc-overload-control says " 8. Syntax This specification extends the existing definition of the Via header field parameters of [RFC3261] as follows: via-params = via-ttl / via-maddr / via-received / via-branch / oc / oc-validity / oc-seq / oc-algo / via-extension oc = "oc" [EQUAL oc-num] oc-num = 1*DIGIT oc-validity = "oc-validity" [EQUAL delta-ms] oc-seq = "oc-seq" EQUAL 1*12DIGIT "." 1*5DIGIT oc-algo = "oc-algo" EQUAL DQUOTE algo-list *(COMMA algo-list) DQUOTE algo-list = "loss" / *(other-algo) other-algo = %x41-5A / %x61-7A / %x30-39 delta-ms = 1*DIGIT" and "11. IANA Considerations This specification defines four new Via header parameters as detailed below in the "Header Field Parameter and Parameter Values" sub- registry as per the registry created by [RFC3968]. The required information is: Header Field Parameter Name Predefined Values Reference __________________________________________________________ Via oc Yes RFCXXXX Via oc-validity Yes RFCXXXX Via oc-seq Yes RFCXXXX Via oc-algo Yes RFCXXXX RFC XXXX [NOTE TO RFC-EDITOR: Please replace with final RFC number of this specification.]" The text of draft-ietf-soc-overload-control refers to both "loss" and "rate" as values for oc-algo. The text of draft-ietf-soc-overload-control section 5.3 refers to the use of oc for either rate or loss "As an example, a value of "oc=10" when the loss-based algorithm is used implies that 10% of the total number of SIP requests (dialog forming as well as in-dialogue) are subject to reduction at the client. Analogously, a value of "oc=10" when the rate-based algorithm [I-D.ietf-soc-overload-rate-control] is used indicates that the client should send SIP requests at a rate of 10 SIP requests or fewer per second." What are you suggesting would go in the "IANA Considerations" section of draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control ? Does it just need a reference to the IANA Considerations in draft-ietf-soc-overload-control? Janet This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose. From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com<mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>> To: Janet P Gunn/USA/CSC@CSC Cc: "draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control.all@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control.all@tools.ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control.all@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control.all@tools.ietf.org>>, "sip-overload@ietf.org<mailto:sip-overload@ietf.org>" <sip-overload@ietf.org<mailto:sip-overload@ietf.org>>, "sip-overload-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:sip-overload-bounces@ietf.org>" <sip-overload-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:sip-overload-bounces@ietf.org>> Date: 06/27/2013 12:54 PM Subject: VS: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control - Christer's comments ________________________________ Hi, >The IANA considerations section of draft-ietf-soc-overload-control registers the new Via header field parameters. > >Is it needed here as well? The draft (Section 5) does extend the oc parameter, doesn’t it? I would assume that needs to go to IANA. Regards, Christer sip-overload-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:sip-overload-bounces@ietf.org> wrote on 06/27/2013 06:05:41 AM: > From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com<mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>> > To: "sip-overload@ietf.org<mailto:sip-overload@ietf.org>" <sip-overload@ietf.org<mailto:sip-overload@ietf.org>> > Cc: "draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control.all@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control.all@tools.ietf.org>" > <draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control.all@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control.all@tools.ietf.org>> > Date: 06/27/2013 06:05 AM > Subject: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control - > Christer's comments > Sent by: sip-overload-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:sip-overload-bounces@ietf.org> > > Hi, > > I have read draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control-04.txt as part of the WGLC. > ... > Q7: In Section 7 you say that there are no IANA considerations. But, > don’t you need to request IANA to register the new Via header field > parameters? > > Regards, > > Christer > > > > > _______________________________________________ > sip-overload mailing list > sip-overload@ietf.org<mailto:sip-overload@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-overload
- [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-… Janet P Gunn
- Re: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-… Janet P Gunn
- Re: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-… Paul Kyzivat
- [sip-overload] NaN? RE: WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-over… Janet P Gunn
- Re: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-… Janet P Gunn
- Re: [sip-overload] NaN? RE: WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-… NOEL, ERIC C (ERIC C)
- Re: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-… NOEL, ERIC C (ERIC C)
- Re: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-… NOEL, ERIC C (ERIC C)
- Re: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-… NOEL, ERIC C (ERIC C)
- Re: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)