IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sip-overload] Local Policy Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-soc-load-control-event-package-05.txt

"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com> Mon, 14 January 2013 14:30 UTC

Return-Path: <vkg@bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D570F21F8860 for <sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 06:30:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.187
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.412, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cZ6Z0GvTXEf5 for <sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 06:30:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ihemail2.lucent.com (ihemail2.lucent.com [135.245.0.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0686721F8841 for <sip-overload@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 06:30:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usnavsmail2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.10]) by ihemail2.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id r0EEUAmK020545 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <sip-overload@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 08:30:11 -0600 (CST)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail-ce2.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by usnavsmail2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id r0EEUAH2024479 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <sip-overload@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 08:30:10 -0600
Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (shoonya.ih.lucent.com [135.185.237.229]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id r0EEUABZ014474 for <sip-overload@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 08:30:10 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <50F416ED.3050506@bell-labs.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 08:32:13 -0600
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sip-overload@ietf.org
References: <20121022163217.13864.84970.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5EBD159DE88147488A3B1590E090018403530A9E6275@njfpsrvexg2.research.att.com> <OF7CCDE698.10939705-ON85257AD4.0072A173-85257AD4.007308A2@csc.com> <CAPSQ9ZVx7K_2_ApjG_sP2uopRLocaasgpJQNUNeh6NmSVAGiyw@mail.gmail.com> <24674_1355758104_50CF3A18_24674_468_1_88CAD1D4E8773F42858B58CAA28272A00E2A2C@PEXCVZYM12.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAPSQ9ZU-9fZRGksgut-UiRmbVfTi9WR9Orn6cockYqgjVjRF7Q@mail.gmail.com> <OF0E1F39E5.19A27B85-ON85257AE5.005E7CF8-85257AE5.005EF464@csc.com> <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE20D7456E216@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> <CAPSQ9ZV10ShtsZwzA10RfBmjyzmLy7TpxomJW+GfPr08qh5z2g@mail.gmail.com> <50E5B529.2090105@bell-labs.com> <OF0589660E.64BDF2 <50F01C82.9010406@bell-labs.com> <OF0CE71656.F6252012-ON85257AF0.004EB2E8-85257AF0.004F322C@csc.com> <50F4007B.5050903@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <50F4007B.5050903@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.35
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.10
Subject: Re: [sip-overload] Local Policy Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-soc-load-control-event-package-05.txt
X-BeenThere: sip-overload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Overload <sip-overload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sip-overload>, <mailto:sip-overload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-overload>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-overload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-overload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-overload>, <mailto:sip-overload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:30:14 -0000

On 01/14/2013 06:56 AM, Salvatore Loreto wrote:
> my reading of the mailing list is that the question of using SHOULD
> versus MUST is being decided in favor of MUST  [...]

Sal: Funny --- my reading of the mailing list after Volker and Janet's
emails suggests that Janet is okay with a SHOULD.

Given the number of people expressing an interest now, I think things
are weighing in favour of a SHOULD.

It will be good to close this so we can get the drafts out.

Thanks,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com
Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email