[sip-overload] draft-ietf-soc-overload-control-13

["Yu, James" <[e-mail]>]

Hi, Henning, Vijay, Volker,

When I reviewed draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control-04.txt, I glanced through the syntax in this I-D to understand the oc related parameters.

When looking at "algo-list", I wonder if there are two "other-algo" such as "abc" and "xyz", 'abc" and "xyz" won't be comma-separated based on the oc-algo syntax.  It seems that algo-list would be

 algo-list = "loss" / other-algo

This would ensure that one and only one algorithm is present in algo-list.  If there is no algorithm other than "loss", *(COMMA algo-list) would take care of that.

Since algo-list contains a single algorithm, may be it is better to use "algo" only.  Or if algo-list contains a list of comma separated algorithms, then alog-list and oc-algo can be modified so that oc-algo has a single "algo-list".  The latter may be better because the current syntax would allow the same algorithm to appear more than once.

James