IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control - Christer's comments

Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com> Thu, 27 June 2013 13:33 UTC

Return-Path: <jgunn6@csc.com>
X-Original-To: sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F110021F9E0C; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 06:33:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bbbyRrgrVcBs; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 06:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail87.messagelabs.com (mail87.messagelabs.com [216.82.250.19]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C6421F9A71; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 06:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Env-Sender: jgunn6@csc.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-13.tower-87.messagelabs.com!1372339964!12945935!1
X-Originating-IP: [20.137.2.88]
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.9; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 30304 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2013 13:32:45 -0000
Received: from amer-mta102.csc.com (HELO amer-mta102.csc.com) (20.137.2.88) by server-13.tower-87.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Jun 2013 13:32:45 -0000
Received: from amer-gw09.amer.csc.com (cscmail.csc.com [20.6.39.245]) by amer-mta102.csc.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r5RDOxiX015028; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 09:25:13 -0400
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3BC5DA@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3BC5DA@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: DCD0F58B:62419D81-85257B97:004A14F0; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.2FP4 SHF97 March 26, 2012
From: Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com>
Message-ID: <OFDCD0F58B.62419D81-ON85257B97.004A14F0-85257B97.004A6779@csc.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 09:32:40 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on AMER-GW09/SRV/CSC(Release 8.5.2FP3 HF204|September 20, 2011) at 06/27/2013 09:26:31 AM, Serialize complete at 06/27/2013 09:26:31 AM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 004A669985257B97_="
Cc: sip-overload-bounces@ietf.org, "draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control.all@tools.ietf.org>, "sip-overload@ietf.org" <sip-overload@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control - Christer's comments
X-BeenThere: sip-overload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Overload <sip-overload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sip-overload>, <mailto:sip-overload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-overload>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-overload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-overload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-overload>, <mailto:sip-overload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:33:03 -0000

Christer,

The IANA considerations section of  draft-ietf-soc-overload-control 
registers the new Via header field parameters.

Is it needed here as well?

Janet



sip-overload-bounces@ietf.org wrote on 06/27/2013 06:05:41 AM:

> From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
> To: "sip-overload@ietf.org" <sip-overload@ietf.org>
> Cc: "draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control.all@tools.ietf.org" 
> <draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control.all@tools.ietf.org>
> Date: 06/27/2013 06:05 AM
> Subject: [sip-overload] WGLC: draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control -
> Christer's comments
> Sent by: sip-overload-bounces@ietf.org
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have read draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control-04.txt as part of the 
WGLC. 
> 
...
> Q7: In Section 7 you say that there are no IANA considerations. But,
> don’t you need to request IANA to register the new Via header field 
> parameters?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Christer
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  _______________________________________________
> sip-overload mailing list
> sip-overload@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-overload

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email