IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sip-overload] Comment on draft-ietf-soc-overload-control SIP Event package section [was RE: draft minutes IETF83]

"Ravindran, Parthasarathi" <pravindran@sonusnet.com> Sun, 08 July 2012 04:23 UTC

Return-Path: <pravindran@sonusnet.com>
X-Original-To: sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6796921F85D4 for <sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 21:23:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.600, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MnM0ghkwjsG3 for <sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 21:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na3sys010aog114.obsmtp.com (na3sys010aog114.obsmtp.com [74.125.245.96]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16FE621F85D0 for <sip-overload@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 21:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from USMA-EX-HUB2.sonusnet.com ([69.147.176.212]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys010aob114.postini.com ([74.125.244.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT/kLbKBxYusFv8btUg8ZPGLGKL1lsvDB@postini.com; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 21:24:13 PDT
Received: from INBA-HUB02.sonusnet.com (10.70.51.87) by USMA-EX-HUB2.sonusnet.com (66.203.90.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.247.3; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 00:24:11 -0400
Received: from INBA-MAIL01.sonusnet.com ([fe80::8d0f:e4f9:a74f:3daf]) by inba-hub02.sonusnet.com ([fe80::80b9:dc60:caf7:7dfc%11]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 09:54:08 +0530
From: "Ravindran, Parthasarathi" <pravindran@sonusnet.com>
To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Thread-Topic: Comment on draft-ietf-soc-overload-control SIP Event package section [was RE: [sip-overload] draft minutes IETF83]
Thread-Index: AQHNRI86dm1Q0tcgiE28amjvCK4nLpccmckAgAJgQGA=
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 04:24:07 +0000
Message-ID: <387F9047F55E8C42850AD6B3A7A03C6C1605D895@inba-mail01.sonusnet.com>
References: <4F93044A.5020207@ericsson.com> <387F9047F55E8C42850AD6B3A7A03C6C0E228BF8@inba-mail01.sonusnet.com> <4F956FC8.2030503@bell-labs.com> <4F95732A.1000506@bell-labs.com> <4F957A0C.4050606@bell-labs.com> <4F957A50.7040402@bell-labs.com> <4F95845B.2040508@bell-labs.com> <387F9047F55E8C42850AD6B3A7A03C6C0E237E4A@inba-mail01.sonusnet.com> <4F97191A.5020501@bell-labs.com> <387F9047F55E8C42850AD6B3A7A03C6C16045036@inba-mail02.sonusnet.com> <4FF75A9E.5090307@bell-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FF75A9E.5090307@bell-labs.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [121.242.142.186]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "sip-overload@ietf.org" <sip-overload@ietf.org>, Volker Hilt <volker.hilt@bell-labs.com>
Subject: Re: [sip-overload] Comment on draft-ietf-soc-overload-control SIP Event package section [was RE: draft minutes IETF83]
X-BeenThere: sip-overload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Overload <sip-overload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sip-overload>, <mailto:sip-overload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-overload>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-overload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-overload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-overload>, <mailto:sip-overload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 04:23:53 -0000

Vijay,

I'm fine with your approach.

Thanks
Partha

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Vijay K. Gurbani [mailto:vkg@bell-labs.com]
>Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2012 3:08 AM
>To: Ravindran, Parthasarathi
>Cc: Volker Hilt; sip-overload@ietf.org
>Subject: Re: Comment on draft-ietf-soc-overload-control SIP Event
>package section [was RE: [sip-overload] draft minutes IETF83]
>
>This response is for Partha's original email archived at
>http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-overload/current/msg00789.html.
>I am not inline including his original email.  Please see above URL for
>the context.
>
>Partha: I am in the process of closing the open issues for draft-ietf-
>soc-overload control.  One of these is yours, although I do not think
>your comments in the above URL will necessitate any changes in the
>draft.  But to close the loop, please see below.
>
>To recap, I had suggested that we remove S9 from draft-ietf-soc-
>overload-control [1], but it was felt that S9 provides useful
>information that should be retained for archival purposes [2].
>
>The merits and demerits of choosing the Via parameter approach over
>SUBS/NOT were looked at a long time ago, and I just want to make sure
>that your intent is not to reopen that discussion.  (Personally, I don't
>think that is a good use of our time.)  In the instance where SUBS/NOT
>adds value to the general SIP overload control problem, an event package
>has been defined for that purpose [4].
>
>So, let's be sure that S9 is currently there for archival purposes only.
>Unless you have specific objections to proceeding with S9 in the draft -
>-- and I don't think you do based on your earlier response in [3] ---
>I'd rather continue moving the work ahead.
>
>Please advise.
>
>[1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-
>overload/current/msg00773.html
>[2] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-
>overload/current/msg00775.html
>[3] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-
>overload/current/msg00780.html
>[4] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-soc-load-control-event-
>package-03
>
>Thanks,
>
>- vijay
>--
>Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
>1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
>Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com
>Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email