Re: [Sip] Authenication Parameters in response to 401 unauthorized

"WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com> Tue, 01 June 2010 19:43 UTC

Return-Path: <dworley@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC123A6A80 for <sip@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 12:43:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.577
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.577 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.022, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JxDCnPRU95Rq for <sip@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 12:43:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82093A6986 for <sip@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 12:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,342,1272859200"; d="scan'208";a="191421282"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 01 Jun 2010 15:42:46 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,342,1272859200"; d="scan'208";a="479976314"
Received: from unknown (HELO DC-US1HCEX3.global.avaya.com) ([135.11.52.22]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 01 Jun 2010 15:42:45 -0400
Received: from DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com ([169.254.2.188]) by DC-US1HCEX3.global.avaya.com ([135.11.52.22]) with mapi; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 15:42:45 -0400
From: "WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com>
To: Moloud Mousavi <moloud@blueslice.com>, "sip@ietf.org" <sip@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 15:40:52 -0400
Thread-Topic: Authenication Parameters in response to 401 unauthorized
Thread-Index: AcsBs94LQFLuKZGUTBKHwk73JdQLNwABUaiwAAJM0E4=
Message-ID: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B21FD736152@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
References: <345A3596DB43194797927F6ADFBFFFEF02619B6495@EX41.exchserver.com>
In-Reply-To: <345A3596DB43194797927F6ADFBFFFEF02619B6495@EX41.exchserver.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Sip] Authenication Parameters in response to 401 unauthorized
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 19:43:02 -0000

________________________________________
From: sip-bounces@ietf.org [sip-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Moloud Mousavi [moloud@blueslice.com]

I was wondering how dresponse in authenticated register is calculated.
The other question: what is the method used for CSeq in case of authenticated register message?
________________________________

The details are in RFC 2617 (HTTP authentication: Basic and Digest Access Authentication) as modified by RFC 3261 section 22.4.

Dale