RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and parameters to UAS via proxy-new version of the draft-holmberg-sip-target-uri-delivery draft
"Elwell, John" <john.elwell@siemens.com> Thu, 17 January 2008 07:59 UTC
Return-path: <sip-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JFPeQ-0001wO-Db; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:59:02 -0500
Received: from sip by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JFPeO-0001wH-CQ for sip-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:59:00 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JFPeN-0001w5-St for sip@ietf.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:58:59 -0500
Received: from mailgate.siemenscomms.co.uk ([195.171.110.225]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JFPeM-0004z9-Om for sip@ietf.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:58:59 -0500
Received: from GBNTHT12009MSX.gb002.siemens.net ([137.223.219.235]) by siemenscomms.co.uk (PMDF V6.3-x14 #31430) with ESMTP id <0JUS00C043I7F0@siemenscomms.co.uk> for sip@ietf.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:58:55 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:58:54 +0000
From: "Elwell, John" <john.elwell@siemens.com>
Subject: RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and parameters to UAS via proxy-new version of the draft-holmberg-sip-target-uri-delivery draft
In-reply-to: A <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF041743D6@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, sip@ietf.org
Message-id: <0D5F89FAC29E2C41B98A6A762007F5D0593E13@GBNTHT12009MSX.gb002.siemens.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-Topic: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and parameters to UAS via proxy-new version of the draft-holmberg-sip-target-uri-delivery draft
thread-index: AchXnY+F82ywc0SeQiGSlvvV9WnM7QAZ7COQAAVV9CAAASbeoAAD/kcgAACRbVAAALp+kAAEi6eAAABgSrAAJYH44A==
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
References: <5D1A7985295922448D5550C94DE2918001AC02E9@DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com> <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF040266B1@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se> <47878B1E.3010303@cisco.com> <0D5F89FAC29E2C41B98A6A762007F5D0549A47@GBNTHT12009MSX.gb002.siemens.net> <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1428F69B@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com> <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF04051C9D@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se> <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1428F846@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com> <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF040960B7@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se> <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1434B83B@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com> A <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF040D69C7@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se> <0D5F89FAC29E2C41B98A6A762007F5D0549D3F@GBNTHT12009MSX.gb002.siemens.net> <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1438F1B0@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com> <478CEFB4.6070002@zonnet.nl> <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF0413D587@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se> <"0D5F89FA C29E2C41B98A6A762007F5D0593C68"@GBNTHT12009MSX.gb002.siemens.net> A <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF04173CB8@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se> <0D5F89FAC29E2C41B98A6A762007F5D0593CFF@GBNTHT12009MSX.gb002.siemens.net> A <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF041743D6@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 5fb88b8381f3896aeacc5a021513237b
Cc: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>, "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <drage@alcatel-lucent.com>, Francois Audet <audet@nortel.com>
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: sip-bounces@ietf.org
Christer, We still seem to have a disconnect in our understanding. See below. John > -----Original Message----- > From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com] > Sent: 16 January 2008 14:32 > To: Elwell, John; sip@ietf.org > Cc: Paul Kyzivat; DRAGE, Keith (Keith); Francois Audet > Subject: RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and parameters > to UAS via proxy-new version of the > draft-holmberg-sip-target-uri-delivery draft > > > John, > > According to the UA-loose-route draft, every proxy in the path need to > support the mechanism in order for the "current target" to be retained > in the R-URI. A good example is the "Service Invocation" use > case in the > UA loose route draft. [JRE] The Service Invocation section in loose-route tells me nothing about proxies on the path. It simply talks about invocation of a service at the UAS. > > Maybe the "loose route" wording is confusing (I think it is also > mentioned in the UA-loose-route draft that a better naming may be > needed)? > > Also, maybe one can assume that a home proxy knows what entities not > registering (MGCs etc) support. But, again, we are not only talking > about home proxies. [JRE] Surely it is only the home proxy that takes an AoR and determines a contact URI to route to. Maybe my understanding of home proxy is different. > > Regards, > > Christer > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Elwell, John [mailto:john.elwell@siemens.com] > > Sent: 16. tammikuuta 2008 15:53 > > To: Christer Holmberg; sip@ietf.org > > Cc: Paul Kyzivat; DRAGE,Keith (Keith); Francois Audet > > Subject: RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and parameters > > to UAS via proxy -new version of the > > draft-holmberg-sip-target-uri-delivery draft > > > > Christer, > > > > I don't think the entity using the mechanism needs to know > > about next hop support for the loose route mechanism - only > > whether the UAS supports it. If the UA registers, then the > > loose route draft provides an automatic mechanism. If the UA > > does not register, support would need to be indicated by > > provisioning. I am not sure this ranks as a significant > > limitation, since a certain amount of provisioning needs to > > be done anyway for UAs such as gateways that do not register. > > > > John > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com] > > > Sent: 16 January 2008 11:51 > > > To: Elwell, John; sip@ietf.org > > > Cc: Paul Kyzivat; DRAGE,Keith (Keith); Francois Audet > > > Subject: RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and > parameters to UAS > > > via proxy -new version of the > > draft-holmberg-sip-target-uri-delivery > > > draft > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > >I hear what you are saying, but I don't really see that the > > > points you > > > raised in section 4 are real limitations of the loose route > > mechanism. > > > > > > I think it is a limitation that an entity using the > > mechanism has to > > > know whether the the next hop supports it or not, and that the > > > mechanism can only be used if the subsequent hops support it. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Christer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Christer Holmberg > [mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com] > > > > > Sent: 16 January 2008 11:06 > > > > > To: Elwell, John; sip@ietf.org > > > > > Cc: Paul Kyzivat; DRAGE, Keith (Keith); Francois Audet > > > > > Subject: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and parameters > > > to UAS via > > > > > proxy - new version of the > > draft-holmberg-sip-target-uri-delivery > > > > > draft > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi John, > > > > > > > > > > >Thanks for this revision, which makes things somewhat > > > > clearer. I do > > > > > >have a couple of comments: > > > > > > > > > > > >1. I am not sure I agree with the assertions in section 4 > > > > concerning > > > > > >issues with the mechanisms in loose-route. Taking > > example 1, the > > > > > >Route header field should contain enough entries to get > > > you to the > > > > > >registered contact, not just to an intermediate proxy. > > > > Therefore this > > > > > >situation should not arise with a correctly implemented > > > > home proxy. > > > > > >It is not clear to me how example 2 could arise either, > > > > for similar > > > > > >reasons. The MGC case can be resolved by taking into > > account the > > > > > >option tag in the REGISTER request, or if it is permanently > > > > > >registered, through provisioning. > > > > > > > > > > The examples are not meant to show bugs in the loose-route > > > > mechanism. > > > > > They are meant to help people understand the > > limitations with the > > > > > loose-route mechanism. > > > > > > > > > > >2. Comparing the mechanism proposed with the loose-route > > > > mechanism, > > > > > >my understanding is: > > > > > >a)When retargeting occurs, the loose-route mechanism > > > > places the new > > > > > >target in the Request URI. Your proposal places the new > > > target in > > > > > >both the Request-URI and the Target header field. > > > > > >b) When rerouting, the loose-route mechanism places the > > > new route > > > > > >(i.e., the registered contact) in the Route header > field. Your > > > > > >proposal places the new route in the Request-URI (the > > > > latter as per > > > > > >RFC 3261). > > > > > >So the two mechanisms solve exactly the same > problems using a > > > > > >slightly different mechanism. Correct? > > > > > > > > > > Yes. The two solutions intend to solve the same problem. > > > > > > > > > > >3. How P-Called-Party-ID fits into this is not really > > > > relevant from > > > > > >an IETF perspective - it seems there are some 3GPP-specific > > > > > >situations where the contents of P-Called-Party-ID will > > > > not equal the > > > > > >contents of Target. Correct? > > > > > > > > > > Correct. > > > > > > > > > > >4. If my suggestion in point 1 above that the loose-route > > > > mechanism > > > > > >does not suffer from the problems suggested, then each > > > > mechanism will > > > > > >work and each addresses the same problem. > > > > > >So it is just down to a beauty contest between the > > two. Correct? > > > > > > > > > > See question 1. > > > > > > > > > > We believe that our solution does not have the same > > > > limitations as the > > > > > loose-route solution. But, again, both solutions intend to > > > > solve the > > > > > same problem. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Christer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: Christer Holmberg > > > [mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com] > > > > > > > Sent: 16 January 2008 08:41 > > > > > > > To: sip@ietf.org > > > > > > > Cc: DRAGE, Keith (Keith); Paul Kyzivat; Elwell, John; > > > > Jeroen van > > > > > > > Bemmel; Francois Audet > > > > > > > Subject: Delivering request-URI and parameters to UAS via > > > > > > proxy - new > > > > > > > version of the > draft-holmberg-sip-target-uri-delivery draft > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We've uploaded a new version (-01) of the Target draft. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We've tried to make things more clear. I've also > > > > removed all text > > > > > > > about P-Called-Party-ID, except from one chapter where > > > > we try to > > > > > > > explain the semantical difference between Target > and P-CPI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can also find the draft from: > > > > > > > > > http://users.piuha.net/cholmber/drafts/draft-holmberg-sip-targ > > > > > > > et-uri-del > > > > > > > ivery-01.txt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Christer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > > > > > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use > > > > > sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on > > current sip Use > > > > > sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the > application of sip > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > > > > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use > > > > sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on > current sip Use > > > > sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip > Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
- [Sip] Delivering request-URI and parameters to UA… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- VS: [Sip] Delivering request-URI and parameters t… Christer Holmberg
- Re: VS: [Sip] Delivering request-URI and paramete… Jonathan Rosenberg
- VS: VS: [Sip] Delivering request-URI and paramete… Christer Holmberg
- [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and parameters t… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Paul Kyzivat
- RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Elwell, John
- RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Francois Audet
- RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Christer Holmberg
- RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Paul Kyzivat
- RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Francois Audet
- RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Christer Holmberg
- RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Christer Holmberg
- RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Christer Holmberg
- [Sip] Delivering request-URI and parameters to UA… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Francois Audet
- RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Christer Holmberg
- RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Elwell, John
- RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Christer Holmberg
- RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Elwell, John
- RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Paul Kyzivat
- RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Francois Audet
- Re: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Jeroen van Bemmel
- RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Christer Holmberg
- RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Christer Holmberg
- [Sip] Delivering request-URI and parameters to UA… Christer Holmberg
- [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and parameters t… Elwell, John
- [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and parameters t… Christer Holmberg
- RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Elwell, John
- RE: [Sip] Delivering request-URI and parameters t… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- RE: [Sip] Delivering request-URI and parameters t… Christer Holmberg
- RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Paul Kyzivat
- [Sip] SIP Routers kamalakar.mergu
- RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Elwell, John
- RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Christer Holmberg
- RE: [Sip] Delivering request-URI and parameters t… youssef.chadli
- RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Sip] Delivering request-URI and parameters t… Enrico Marocco
- Re: [Sip] SIP Routers James M. Polk
- RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Elwell, John
- RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Christer Holmberg
- RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Elwell, John
- [Sip] Vocabulary and problem statement for Reques… Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] Vocabulary and problem statement for Re… Dean Willis
- RE: [Sip] Vocabulary and problem statement for Re… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- RE: [Sip] Vocabulary and problem statement for Re… Hadriel Kaplan
- RE: [Sip] Vocabulary and problem statement for Re… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] Vocabulary and problem statement for Re… Dean Willis
- RE: [Sip] Vocabulary and problem statement for Re… Sanjay Sinha (sanjsinh)
- RE: [Sip] Vocabulary and problem statement for Re… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] Vocabulary and problem statement for Re… Dean Willis
- Re: [Sip] Vocabulary and problem statement for Re… Jeroen van Bemmel
- RE: [Sip] Vocabulary and problem statement for Re… Elwell, John
- Re: [Sip] Vocabulary and problem statement for Re… Paul Kyzivat
- RE: [Sip] Vocabulary and problem statement for Re… Hadriel Kaplan
- RE: [Sip] Vocabulary and problem statement forReq… Elwell, John
- RE: [Sip] Vocabulary and problem statement forReq… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [Sip] Vocabulary and problem statement forReq… Paul Kyzivat
- RE: [Sip] Vocabulary and problem statement forReq… Elwell, John
- RE: [Sip] Vocabulary and problem statementforRequ… Elwell, John
- Re: [Sip] Vocabulary and problem statement forReq… Paul Kyzivat
- RE: [Sip] Vocabulary and problem statementforRequ… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Jonathan Rosenberg
- RE: [Sip] Delivering request-URI and parameters t… youssef.chadli
- Re: [Sip] Delivering request-URI and parameters t… Paul Kyzivat
- RE: [Sip] Delivering request-URI and parameters t… youssef.chadli
- RE: [Sip] RE: Delivering request-URI and paramete… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] Delivering request-URI and parameters t… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Sip] Delivering request-URI and parameters t… Hans Erik van Elburg