Re: [Sip] On The Essentialness of Corrections

Dean Willis wrote:
> It's the "logical product" of the essential corrections process.
> 
> Each draft in the essential corrections process has to specify 
> line-by-line changes to the RFC it is correcting. If we were to extract 
> those changes and apply them to the source, we would get the "tracking 
> draft" I'm talking about.

OK; I am with you now.  In that case, yes, maintaining one draft
is preferable.

This also means that -- as Jonathan said earlier -- we have to be
careful as to what constitutes an essential correction  vs. new
functionality.

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
2701 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9F-546, Lisle, Illinois 60532 (USA)
Email: vkg@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
WWW:   http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/bell-labs

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip