Re: [Sip] Need opinion
"Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com> Thu, 30 September 2010 15:49 UTC
Return-Path: <dworley@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 761593A6AE3 for <sip@core3.amsl.com>;
Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.467
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.467 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.132,
BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QU+QvBqb3dAo for
<sip@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-us1-iereast-outbound-tmp.us1.avaya.com
(p-us1-iereast-outbound-tmp.us1.avaya.com [135.11.29.16]) by core3.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A863A6918 for <sip@ietf.org>;
Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:49:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,260,1283745600"; d="scan'208";a="37055556"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by
p-us1-iereast-outbound-tmp.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP;
30 Sep 2010 11:50:03 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,260,1283745600"; d="scan'208";a="521714509"
Received: from dc-us1hcex1.us1.avaya.com (HELO DC-US1HCEX1.global.avaya.com)
([135.11.52.20]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP;
30 Sep 2010 11:50:02 -0400
Received: from DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com ([169.254.2.129]) by
DC-US1HCEX1.global.avaya.com ([2002:870b:3414::870b:3414]) with mapi;
Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:50:02 -0400
From: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com>
To: "sulabh.deshmukh@wipro.com" <sulabh.deshmukh@wipro.com>,
"sip@ietf.org" <sip@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:46:32 -0400
Thread-Topic: Need opinion
Thread-Index: Actgb14hp48pgNRJRHGnPAswkE6IQQAR0k/Q
Message-ID: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B21FFC79C71@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
References: <D90C1FAC55221D4D9563354E245E3BB103426CB6@HYD-MKD-MBX02.wipro.com>
In-Reply-To: <D90C1FAC55221D4D9563354E245E3BB103426CB6@HYD-MKD-MBX02.wipro.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Sip] Need opinion
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>,
<mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>,
<mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:49:20 -0000
________________________________________ From: sip-bounces@ietf.org [sip-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of sulabh.deshmukh@wipro.com [sulabh.deshmukh@wipro.com] I am some doubt regarding the RFC4566. If you see the red marked attribute this same attribute is getting repeated in the SDP. I just want to confirm, is this acceptable behavior? ________________________________________ According to the principle of "Be strict in what you send and lenient in what you accept", sending two lines that say "a=rtpmap:98 AMR/8000/1" should not be done, but the receiver should accept them and interpret them to mean that payload type number 98 is "AMR/8000/1". Dale
- [Sip] Need opinion sulabh.deshmukh
- Re: [Sip] Need opinion Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: [Sip] Need opinion Kevin P. Fleming