[Sip] Re: RLS and identity

Aki Niemi wrote:

>
> Just a minor note on this: if/when mandating the support for asserted 
> identity in the event-list draft, please remember to say that 
> p-asserted identities also count (to some extent).

Based on Rohan's suggestion, the text will effectively say:

 - Jon's Identity draft will be mandatory to implement, optional to use.

 - Other mechanisms that have properties such that they can adequately
   convey the identity of the subscriber and the permission of the RLS
   to subscribe on the user's behalf can also be used.

If you think that your architecture, in combination with 
P-Asserted-Identity, satisfies the second bullet, then you're probably 
fine. However, I think it is a really bad idea to specifically include 
any mention of P-Asserted-Identity in the draft.

/a

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip