Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip-archive@optimus.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-sip-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1F83A6918; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:38:40 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291433A6918 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:38:39 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pf2KfTATaVZg for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:38:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mgw-mx03.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.122.230]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B693A6803 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:38:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-mx03.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id n0J6c2SB009885; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:38:16 +0200 Received: from vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.30]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:37:44 +0200 Received: from mgw-int01.ntc.nokia.com ([172.21.143.96]) by vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:37:39 +0200 Received: from [172.21.43.191] (esdhcp043191.research.nokia.com [172.21.43.191]) by mgw-int01.ntc.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id n0J6bbFa025697; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:37:38 +0200 From: Aki Niemi To: ext Dean Willis In-Reply-To: References: <1222413851.8449.15.camel@little.research.nokia.com> <91B7DF7A-8076-4589-8464-1422FCA1E44E@softarmor.com> <49705633.20107@ericsson.com> Organization: Nokia Devices R&D Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:37:38 +0200 Message-Id: <1232347058.28389.117.camel@little.research.nokia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jan 2009 06:37:39.0500 (UTC) FILETIME=[6C7586C0:01C97A00] X-Nokia-AV: Clean Cc: SIP IETF , Keith Drage Subject: Re: [Sip] Conclusion of WGLC on draft-ietf-sip-subnot-etags-03 X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sip-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: sip-bounces@ietf.org pe, 2009-01-16 kello 12:18 -0600, ext Dean Willis kirjoitti: > > I am wandering what happened to this draft, > > almost one year ago the draft was ready to progress to be published, > > but it didn't > > and the draft expired in July! > > Now what is it necessary to do to let this draft progress and > > finally become an RFC ? > > > > The author lost motivation. Huh? Admittedly not an entirely incorrect description of the current author's status, however, I was under the impression that we were waiting for document shepherd write-up: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip/current/msg24819.html At least I've not seen nor heard of any fresh issues on this draft that would need my attention. I may not have the cycles to get deeply involved in the WG discussions at the moment, but I have enough time to work this draft past the finish line. Cheers, Aki -- Aki Niemi Maemo Software, Nokia Devices R&D _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip