[Sip] Infinite Number of RTP payload in "mline"
Nitin Kapoor <nitinkapoorr@gmail.com> Wed, 01 September 2010 13:50 UTC
Return-Path: <nitinkapoorr@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 56B853A69F5 for <sip@core3.amsl.com>;
Wed, 1 Sep 2010 06:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.669
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.560,
BAYES_05=-1.11, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xQZd1sBpEPyT for
<sip@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 06:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com (mail-qw0-f44.google.com
[209.85.216.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C9A3A6915 for
<sip@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 06:50:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qwc9 with SMTP id 9so6967287qwc.31 for <sip@ietf.org>;
Wed, 01 Sep 2010 06:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=zK8U6YIwhGqVRET3e89muaNsPYvumg3ra81u/GgBA/4=;
b=w/qsF6A88JaDUY+devMe+0fm5nOOj69Fgpz+8BgeYyohM2x9+z0HCnXXJHWWKf2vFD
/ljsEPnAXRvcgBs/c10XwzKLrTIxp4PTm2FzmBypKzZx0udXMgkn4IYU6U66dZHOP7gX
Vdlc0wwLL5eQMF3at0fXwE7/JqVymYsaOVR3w=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
b=QIsPCvhXOKhu2DaxfK0LhHsY8eKcMevPEEy0giWDq6hf54XAMBGuZ/h/Ud80mO7O7S
eRlLE5fMr/TcvZx0SC/jntHWrf0Q2Zlv3FzBudS4VA7QdJN8Xshal8NydvTsHQLnLSY+
xrY66rdw6rotTytuAQpWJzgYhe1bK2ToMYUtk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.53.206 with SMTP id n14mr5206515qag.20.1283349080637;
Wed, 01 Sep 2010 06:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.72.28 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 06:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:51:20 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTikg9wcC0Q3hyc3g6h1rJoQfPrEFd=VJc_NCoNCV@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nitin Kapoor <nitinkapoorr@gmail.com>
To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu, sip@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175d0aae130098048f32fe24
Subject: [Sip] Infinite Number of RTP payload in "mline"
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>,
<mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>,
<mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:50:56 -0000
Dear All, I am facing the problem where one of source is sending bunch of RTP payload in "mline", and because of that my MSX is stripping 2 codec from that line, when its forwarding that OFFER to termination end. This is the "mline" which i am getting from source: *m=audio 6300 RTP/AVP 18 0 8 35 36 2 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 4 80 3 56 118 101 13 120* This is what my MSX is sending to termination after stripping the payload from "mline" *m=audio 6300 RTP/AVP 18 0 8 35 36 2 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 4 80 3 56 118 101 * Now i checked some documents but unable to find anything which says its correct or not. Could any one please give some direction on this whether such amount of payload type is correct in "mline" or it not acceptable . Thanks, Nitin Kapoor
- [Sip] Infinite Number of RTP payload in "mline" Nitin Kapoor
- Re: [Sip] Infinite Number of RTP payload in "mlin… Paul E. Jones
- Re: [Sip] [Sip-implementors] Infinite Number of R… Nitin Kapoor
- Re: [Sip] [Sip-implementors] Infinite Number of R… Paul E. Jones
- Re: [Sip] [Sip-implementors] Infinite Number of R… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Sip] Infinite Number of RTP payload in "mlin… Worley, Dale R (Dale)