Re: [Sip] nit in draft-wing-sip-e164-rrc-01

"DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)" <drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Mon, 03 March 2008 07:45 UTC

Return-Path: <sip-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-sip-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-sip-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3260228C4FD; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 23:45:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.852
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.852 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.415, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jK875msDYDru; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 23:44:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF263A6E6E; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 23:44:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AAB73A6F81 for <sip@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 23:44:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u7VAPK+W-duk for <sip@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 23:44:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567583A6F35 for <sip@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 23:44:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ilexp01.ndc.lucent.com (h135-3-39-1.lucent.com [135.3.39.1]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id m237hpsb009023; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 01:43:54 -0600 (CST)
Received: from DEEXP01.de.lucent.com ([135.248.187.65]) by ilexp01.ndc.lucent.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 3 Mar 2008 01:43:52 -0600
Received: from DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com ([135.248.187.20]) by DEEXP01.de.lucent.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 3 Mar 2008 08:43:43 +0100
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 08:43:43 +0100
Message-ID: <5D1A7985295922448D5550C94DE2918001CB0893@DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <004d01c87b34$3406dd00$58a36b80@cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Sip] nit in draft-wing-sip-e164-rrc-01
Thread-index: Ach4x0TCNh6QwqPNQeO7TMN1gaeTRACbLenwAE+QocA=
References: <1DDB0D3CC4E7F14FAE946361C0A6065504FCB700@isr-jlm-mail.Kayote.com> <004d01c87b34$3406dd00$58a36b80@cisco.com>
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>, David Schwartz <David.Schwartz@Kayote.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Mar 2008 07:43:43.0942 (UTC) FILETIME=[4E6FDE60:01C87D02]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.37
Cc: sip@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Sip] nit in draft-wing-sip-e164-rrc-01
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: sip-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: sip-bounces@ietf.org

In the PSTN you get both options - 

Allow the call to complete

Call automatically rejected with a specific ISUP cause value anonymous
call rejection (which now has a SIP equivalent).

Regards

Keith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Dan Wing
> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 12:36 AM
> To: 'David Schwartz'
> Cc: sip@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Sip] nit in draft-wing-sip-e164-rrc-01
> 
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sip-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of 
> > David Schwartz
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 2:31 PM
> > To: dwing@cisco.com
> > Cc: sip@ietf.org
> > Subject: [Sip] nit in draft-wing-sip-e164-rrc-01
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Dan
> > 
> > a quick comment on this draft...
> > 
> > There is no discussion of what happens when there is a validation 
> > failure. While obvious, you should probably reference 4474 
> processing 
> > upon validation failure (i.e.
> > respond with 438 'Invalid Identity Header'). And while on 
> the topic in 
> > your second example where the cert comparison test fails 
> your diagram 
> > still shows the call proceeding to its destination (hence 
> the earlier 
> > comment).
> 
> I'm not sure we want to fail a call if validation fails; 
> rather, we may want to allow it to complete and tell the user 
> 'unauthenticated caller' (similar to what the PSTN does today 
> by displaying "unidentified call" when caller ID failed).
> 
> -d
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use 
> sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip 
> Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
> 
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip